![]()
vol 7: Notes 2005 Sunday 15 May
Site map
1: About
Next:
|
... to restore theology to the mainstream of science
Notes[Notebook: DB 57 Language] [Sunday 15 May 2005 - Saturday 21 May 2005] [page 141] Sunday 15 May 2005Life of Pi Martel Martel page 49: The Bank of Karma Turing page 248: Computing machines join seamlessly and give us a paradigm for understanding the unity of dynamic systems comprising a multiplicity of atomic acts of 'motions'. Turing Martel Pi page 64: 'They didn't know I was a practicing Hindu, Christian and Muslim page 77: 'people move n the hope of a better life' Monday 16 May 2005Cantor's continuum exists in a Euclidian (or locally analogous) metric space. We seek a logical continuum where distance is measured by the number of logical operations between one form (ordered set of symbols) and another (a 'Hamming distance'). This measure of distance depends to some extent on the algorithm used to make the [page 142] transformation whereby the distance is measured. The space in which we measure this is the ;transfinite network' which we might consider a noetic (computational) measure space. This space allows us to measure the distance between two minds, two religions and so on. We've been through a few paradigm shifts since the first well documented paradigms in our history, the work of the ancient Greek scientists from Parmenides via Zeno, Pythagoras, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle through to the beginnings of Christianity. Then , of course, Christianity, founded in the authors of the Bible. Christianity became coterminous with the Roman Empire. Then Christianity went dark for a while and the Arabic world shone and began to nibble way at Christian territory in North Africa, Spain and the Middle East. Christianity made a comeback in the middle ages, fired by political and militant Popes and the rediscovery of Ancient Greece through Arabic tradition. Then Reformation, Renaissance, Enlightenment (secularism, human rights, rule of law, democracy) Variable depth network: The boundary between transfinite numbers is a software thing. The higher number is created by permuting the lower. The observable world permutes within the bounds of countable unitarity - ie the total number of 'simultaneous' quantum events in the universe is countable, and in the local universe finite. Every level on the scale of complexity looks pretty much the same. What is important is their ordering - what sits on what. Object oriented programming. [page 143] We are looking for a structure which is large enough to capture the universal process, event by event, from the beginning and forever, and our candidate, as ever, is the transfinite network. Theodosius Dobzhansky: 'Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.' Dobzhansky 'The wave function of the universe' Everett The transfinite network is a model of everything (theory) Tuesday 17 May 2005Meaning = 1/frequency. FREQUENCY is not arbitrary but is determined by constraints on stationary states, as in the atom. These constraints are unitarity and computability = observability = halting = 'emission of a quantum = sending a message. Computability also corresponds to the 'collapse of the wave function' or the diagonalization of a matrix, ie the discovery of a set of eigenfunctions of the matrix and of their corresponding eigenvalues. So the frequency of impossible events is zero and the continued existence of the universe in some form we take to be 1. Intermediate forms (like me) have intermediate frequencies. GENERAL RELATIVITY General covariance : things that are true in a network regardless of the actual messages being transmitted. [page 144] Very rarely are our relationships with another person completely tranquil. There are disagreements at all scales from imperceptible to murderous at a range of frequencies from 1 to 1/aleph(0) (like earthquakes. Highly inconsistent (violent) (fatal) events are rarer. We have long felt that consistency and probability are related by whether waves are in or out of phase (corresponding to canceling one another). So the probability of an event is |phi| 2 . The transfinite numbers give us a framework big enough to correspond to every event in the universe. Cantor began geometrically wondering how many points can fit into the natural like, but he ended up algebraically and arithmetically in whole new world of numbers transcending aleph(1) = 2 aleph(0), the assumed cardinal of the line. Despite their huge size, 'resolution' in the transfinite cardinals is the same as the naturals, insofar as they proceed by distinct steps from aleph(n) to aleph(n+1) with nothing in between, just like the naturals. They have a sort of rounding expressed by the equation 2aleph(0) - aleph(0) aleph(0) = aleph(1) > aleph(0). Only transfinite exponentiation can carry us from one transfinite number to another; all other arithmetic operations are 'nilpotent' . Transfinite exponentiation is an infinite task, expressed by Cantor as 'covering' (Belegung). The transfinite tree has its leaves in the present and gives us a way to represent the pedigree of every event back to the initial singularity. [page 145] While 4-space is adequate to map the events a the physical level, transfinite dimensional function space is necessary to express the meaning of the events. In the transfinite network, all communications come down to the countable physical layer (what about quantum teleportation?), which acts as a bottleneck, so that no matter how transcendent and complex my mind may be, you can only see it through the finite means of these words. Unitarity = conservation of probability tells us that the universe is 'full' from physical point of view (pleroma, pure act) - as much is happening as can possibly happen, and if one thing happens it excludes their possible outcomes. The human social network runs on language, human language, spoken, written, the language of love, body language, and all the languages that belong to more general animal biological and physical layers. As we move from society to society we encounter a large set of human languages, although the gradual coalescence of small human groups into large ones has led to the fading and death of many small languages. Collectively, all the protocols of the human social network are here known as religion [culture?] Many levels of complexity flow through me, the molecules I breath, eat, drink and secrete through many different channels. Agatha Zero page 130: Truth easier than lies, more efficient, more stable, more conducive to fitness. Christie But one can always defect to advantage on an efficient system, put less in, take [page 145] more out. Wednesday 18 May 2005Thursday 19 May 2005Friday 20 May 2005The critical prerequisite for efficient management is global perspective. This is the role of the directors who for that reason do not involve themselves in the day to day detail, but try to simplify things down to the big picture. Mathematical induction is a symmetry with respect to complexity. CARDINAL = SIZE We learn the cardinal number of a set (and its minimum ordinal number) by compressing it until it can be compressed no more (Chaitin, Shannon). The difference between the transfinite cardinals is that while aleph(n) is the alphabet for aleph(n+1), all the information in aleph(n+1) cannot be compressed down to aleph(n) Is the space of mathematics one or many? It is one insofar as any structure can be transformed into any other (vie for instance arithmetic (Goedel) or a computing machine (Turing) Abstraction - renormalization group - reducing complexity while retaining meaning - translation of mind to language. Wilson Infinity means without a boundary, but does not say anything about size, only no boundary (open) [page 147] Although a consensus takes time to evolve, the evolution does not even start until someone comes up with a nucleus around which consensus can accrete; in other words, something that everyone can recognize as honestly capturing their point of view. Dauben/Cantor: 'Russell ... affirmed the ultimate reduction of all mathematics to purely logical principles. ... Mathematics for the logician, concerned only the proper use of symbols'. [ie communicating according to established protocols. Catholicism is noetically normative, as the old dictionaries used to be lexicographically normative. No more. Science must now follow reality, not direct it. This is the role of technology. Saturday 21 May 2005Further readingBooks
Papers
Links
|
Click on an "Amazon" link in the booklist at the foot of the page to buy the book, see more details or search for similar items
Related sites:
Concordat Watch Revealing Vatican attempts to propagate its religion by international treaty
|
next: previous: Notes 2005 : Toc |
| This page was last built on 12/9/07; 4:21:40 PM by jhn. tnrp@bigpond.com |