natural theology

We have just published a new website that summarizes the ideas of this site. Available at Cognitive Cosmology.com.

Contact us: Click to email

Notes

Sunday 8 January - Saturday 15 January 2023

[Notebook: DB 88 Salvation]

[page 239]

Sunday 8 January 2023

The universe walks, it does not spin. Maybe God writes in complex numbers, periodic functions which may be transformed into real signals.

Omnes page 237: A New Beginning; A Preliminary Report; '. . . a new philosophy of knowledge. Roland Omnes (2002): Qantum Philosophy: Understanding and Interpreting Contemporary Science

238: He claims to have identified an unbridgeable gap between theory and the real world. Common sense collapsed when confronted by the infinitesimally small in the spaces of intelligibility, locality, causality, discernibility and cognizability.

page 239; Omnes plan (see page 63) 'One of my most precious dreams . . . is to see one day scientific knowledge so clearly established as to allow a return of philosophy to its pre-Socratic sources.'

page 240: To break the circle [of science] means finding that which it cannot learn about itself by itself. It is finding a fundamental principle for science that science itself cannot provide. Only then, perhaps, may metaphysics [theology?] begin.

' The probable existence of a beginning of the universe is proof of the creation of the world and as a consequence, the existencre of a creator.'

[page 240]

Omnes page 244: Mircea Eliade: 'In short "the sacred" is an element of the structure of consciousness and not a mere stage in the development of consciousness. Mircea Eliade (1981): A History of Religious Beliefs and Ideas Volume 1: From the Stone Age to the Eleusinian Mysteries

page 245; Sacred - 'powerful, rich and meaningful.' Given that God is omnino simplex it is meaningless, sole, related to no other. The role of creation is to create meaning within god, from duality to transfinity.

' To sum up: the way we see it the sacred is everywhere in the universe and nothing is completely profane. Profanity is but an illusion of our on ignorance, the slumber of our mind or the madness of our false ideas.' Laplace rules. Laplace's demon - Wikipedia

page 246: 'Science as Representation: Science is a representation of reality, an abstract and coded picture, albeit a faithful one.'

He does not discuss the social sciences, ie human communication [which holds the clue to quantum communication], so he misses the point entirely and his book is more or less useless.

page 248: 'Science represents the world as bundled up inside a tight network of laws.' No, it is a system of layered symmetries, the more universal laws like action and energy being deeper symmetries. Noether. Noether's theorem - Wikipedia

page 250: Science evolves as the universe evolves and the evolution of science retraces the evolution of the universe.

page 252: Thomas Kuhn, the Darwin of Science. Thomas Kuhn (1996): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

page 254: Kuhn and Foucault: 'in both cases the rallying concepts épistémè or paradigm may be convenient indicators for the history of mentalities but they have nothing in common with reality, the only object relevant to science.' He speaks as though science has noting to do with mind or mentality.

page 255: Method, a set of criteria for testing truth. Science conjecture and refutation (Popper), Evolution, variation and selection, (Darwin) Karl Popper (1972): Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Charles Darwin (1859): The Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life

page 259: 'Calculation is practically never the case in biology' ? Statistical proof that variation and selection lead to new species is the mathematical foundation of biology.

page 261: Intelligence and evolution are based on variation, trial, success, and failure, especially in engineering.

page 269 'we are ready to accept, pending a complete inventory, that there exists an irreducible disjuncture, a chasm, between theory and reality.

[page 241]

' By "theory of knowledge" I understand a scheme seeming to explain how human knowledge may know the world, a world that made its own laws.' Including, of course, knowledge at all scales from bacteria to universities. The world knows itself. We are but a minuscule subset.

page 271: ' It is only now, almost at the end of the book that we really address the philosophy of knowledge.'

page 273: He has a very naive idea of particles: ' . . . the barren poverty of particles reduced to themselves would be unable to sustain any symbols that might conceal the laws. Hence mathematics exists by itself, as the consistency and fecundity of the fragments already discovered by the human mind suggests. He is ignorant, as Aristotle and Aquinas were, of the huge density of information in matter. Jeffrey Nicholls (2017): Computing power of a grain of sand: the calculation

' The chasm' the ultimate irreducibility of Reality to formalism.' It is as though he had never heard of Hilbert, Gödel and Turing.

page 274: 'the notion of existence': in the world, to exist is to communicate.

'Logos never never offers itself in concrete form.' Maybe he has never seen a logic book [the initial singularity, the actus purus, which exists before the distinction into potential and kinetic, is de facto concrete]. [see end of page 245, below.]

page 276: John 'In the beginning was the word . . . and the word was made flesh.' In the beginning was the Hilbert space, and Hilbert space became observable.

page 279: ' Everything becomes clear if Logos is a consistent entity independent of Reality.' A backdoor Christian proof of the independence of God like Lonergan. Bernard Lonergan (1992): Insight: A study of human understanding

page 281: 'What matters is to know that we are moving ahead and there will be celebrations of the mind, and that, perhaps, philosophy may soon start again'. It is Christian books like this which increase my faith in cognitive cosmology, rough as it might be in its current incarnation.

Thinking back on my days as a tradie I am trying to bring the same physical authenticity to my writing which may therefore end up as being as exciting as a cheap but strong and durable tin shed.

Monday 9 January 2023

Smaldino: 'When a measure becomes a target it ceases to be a good measure. Paul E. Smaldino & Richard McElreath: The natural selection of bad science.

[page 24]

Tuesday 10 January 2023

The central plank of my case against the Church is their claim that we are all sinners and they have the only answer. The rebuttal comes from the theory of evolution which shows that rate of competition (sometimes deadly) and cooperation in the development of the universe [are such that the initial singularity has developed into the current magnificent universe.]

My project with the Catholic Church is to get a new category of child abuse, child intellectual abuse, institutionalized fake news.

Zoe Steggall is advocating political advertising reform to protect against misinformation. Maeve McGregor: Time is running out to protect the Voice referendum from lies and deceit

Omnes [these notes pp. 231 sqq] is very upset about the role of mathematics in physics but it does seem quite essential and one of the key insights, taken up by Feynman, was Dirac's paper on the Lagrangian in quantum mechanics which became the core of the path integral representation of quantum mechanics which provided us with a visual interpretation of stationary action as the point at which the 'waves' are in harmony so that small changes in frequency [and phase] make no difference to the result. The heart of this appears to be the algebraic relationship between complex exponential and the trigonometric functions, the Pythagorean notion of harmony and fixed points (eigenvectors, eigenvalues), and the overall picture that what counts is the communication between sources using as an alphabet the eigenvalues of the relevant operators. The key to evolution in the simplest regions of the universe, as in the biological world, is heritability. This is easy to understand when each organism carries two copies of itself, that is itself and the genotype which may be passed on to the offspring. How do we do this among fundamental particles? We think along lines of symmetry. The genotype of a species is the symmetry which defines the species. The groups that define the generations of particles may play a similar role, establishing symmetries between, for instance, the electrodynamic communications between photons and charged particles. P. A. M. Dirac (1933): The Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics, Feynman & Hibbs (1965): Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, The Feynman Lectures on Physics: I:22 Algebra

I want to say that actus purus is a thing represented by complex number orthogonal to the real numbers that represent observations, which we write |φ|2.

Wednesday 11 January 2023
Thursday 12 January 2023

78 today. V4.2_ evolution, V4.3_evil.

[page 243]

V4.4_cooperation_rules: otherwise the universe would just be hydrogen, or less.

The network is more powerful that its parts, so Putin, like Hitler, is doomed [but the whole needs the parts to exist]. Nothing can take on the world and win. If I am to beat the Church, I must coopt the world, that is effectively implement my theory of creation.

[classical] Causality is not creative but deterministic, like a Turing machine. What we need for creation is the randomness which is a feature of a network [arising from deterministic machines interrupting one another at random times] , but a network is also a more complex environment with the power to select stable systems. Ie the environment is bigger than the individual, so I swim in a sea of books, the work of other people which shape my thoughts by my selection of who to agree with and who to disagree with. A recent change has been changing my starting point from triplicity to duality.

I think of all these plants [in the park] millions of generations old which have slowly formed themselves to suit their environments [and which have had their own somewhat smaller influence upon the environment in which they find themselves].

Friday 13 January 2023

Why does random evolution lead to complexification? Why does cooperation beat competition: [because it has higher entropy, choosing from more possibilities?] It is all in the selection [the information in the entity selected is equal to the entropy of the space from which it is chosen].

Cause = communication. Deterministic cause = error free communication resulting from an invertible codec. Thinking through Galileo's dynamics in information theoretic terms. Drake. Codec - Wikipedia, Stillman Drake (1995): Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography

The Platonists and their Christian followers consider the visible world to be an illusion and the invisible world to be real. How wrong can you get?

Saturday 14 January 2023

Physical theology. Given its simple beginning and its current complexity we can assume without doubt that some effective creative force is at work. We may see analogies of this force in intellectual insight and sexual orgasm which may explain our preoccupation with these events and lead us to want to explain them by some process of evolution which is creative beyond causality, fed by variation and selection, the mechanism of evolution driven by pure action and logical consistent in music and Hilbert space.

[244]

Alfred North Whitehead, Cosmic Philosophy. Alfred North Whitehead (1979): Process and Reality

We can say, pretty much without doubt, that it is the attitude of institutions like the Catholic Church which has made the pornography industry do completely disrespectful of women, almost uniformly derided as sluts. Slut-shaming - Wikipedia

2023: Still wondering about the way to go next. Evolution, peace, lust for life. At the root of it all the slogan: 'god is pure act, the action of action is to act.' From this we derive waves and music built around the Huygens-Fresnel principle (with modern quantum modifications). Huygens-Fresnel principle - Wikipedia

The physical thing is to some degree a refutation of Plato but also incorporates the notion explaining Wigner's observation that mathematics physically represented by written symbols is constrained by the principle of non-contradiction. This seems clear enough with logic and the real numbers as explained by Gödel and Turing, but complex numbers, as invisible facilitators, enable mathematics to go where real numbers cannot go [but computation can go there simply by correctly coding complex numbers]. This fact seems to be implicit in quantum mechanics and I am currently mystified by the theological / formal role of algebraic completeness which is an important feature of Wigner's world and his contributions to quantum theory. Wigner's theorem - Wikipedia

Here we find a solution / refutation of Omnes' problems with the mathematical description of the physical world. Maybe I should reinstate the chapter on the mathematical community in cognitive cosmology are rewrite the existing page 25: Conclusion.

Russell in Desmet: "The splendid certainty I had always hoped to find in mathematics was lost in a bewildering maze. Ronald Desmet; Alfred North Whitehead (Stanford Ecyclopedia of Philosophy)

Hardy on Principia Mathematica "mathematics, one may say, is the science of propositional functions."

Whitehead: "symbolic logic represents only a minute fragment of the possibilities of the algebraic method".

'Whitehead saw the extension of the Principia to a fourth volume on geometry / physics. [He] defined points as equivalence classes of converging series of volumes as Cantor had defined real numbers as equivalence classes of converging series of rational numbers.' So forgetting that god only made the integers and the universe is quantized, and consequently geometrically pixellated [but he came to the quantum later, below].

[page 245]

Special relativity moved Whitehead's interest to volumes of spacetime - events.

1920: Whitehead alternative to Einsteins relativity. He was trying to improve the explanatory content of relativity rather than its predictive content.

Einstein non-linear, Whitehead linear.

'Surely we can be scientific without taming the authority of our intuition and without engaging in the disastrous race to disenchant nature and mankind' (Desmet, echoes Omnes ?).

Carlo Rovelli: ' The world of quantum mechanics is not a world of objects, it is world of events.'

Whitehead: "Modern physical science is the issue of a coordinated effort sustained for more than three centuries, to understand those activities of nature by reason of which the transitions of sense perception occur." This requires an understanding of the world and an understanding of sense perception.

Whitehead 1934: "The fundamental concepts are activity and process . . . the notion of self sufficient isolation is not exemplified in modern physics. There are essentially no self contained activities in limited regions . . . "

'The enormous success of scientific abstractions has foisted onto philosophy the task of accepting them as the most concrete rendering of fact, and thereby modern philosophy has been ruined. . . . But this juggling with abstractions can never overcome the current confusion introduced as the ascription of misplaced concreteness to the scientific scheme." Very Omnes.

"As we think we live."

Process and reality: The ultimate metaphysical truth is atomism.

Not philosophers but theologians saved process philosophy from ruin. Centre for Process Studies: Mission and History

We might say that the difference between abstract and concrete is a question of entropy, information density or cardinal number, so the natural state of the simple [initial] universe is in effect abstract [and so perhaps naturally suited to mathematical treatment.

Copyright:

You may copy this material freely provided only that you quote fairly and provide a link (or reference) to your source.

Further reading

Books

Darwin (1859), Charles, The Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, Cambridge University Press 1859, 2009 ' It's hard to talk about The Origin of Species without making statements that seem overwrought and fulsome. But it's true: this is indeed one of the most important and influential books ever written, and it is one of the very few groundbreaking works of science that is truly readable. . . . Darwin's friend and "bulldog" T.H. Huxley said upon reading the Origin, "How extremely stupid of me not to have thought of that." Alfred Russel Wallace had thought of the same theory of evolution Darwin did, but it was Darwin who gathered the mass of supporting evidence—on domestic animals and plants, on variability, on sexual selection, on dispersal—that swept most scientists before it.' Mary Ellen Curtin 
Amazon
  back

Drake (1995), Stillman, Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography, Dover Publications 1995 Jacket: Based entirely on original sources, Professor Drake's scrupulously researched study includes translations of much correspondence and other material previously unpublished in English. The result is a volume of exceptional richness and immediacy that paints a vivid portrait of one of history's greatest minds, leaving the philosophical implications of his work aside and focussing on the enduring scientific achievements that represent Galileo's true legacy to mankind.' 
Amazon
  back

Eliade (1981), Mircea, and Willard T. Trask (translator), A History of Religious Beliefs and Ideas Volume 1: From the Stone Age to the Eleusinian Mysteries, U of Chicago Press (1981) "No one has done so much as Mr. Eliade to inform literature students in the West about 'primitive' and Oriental religions. . . . Everyone who cares about the human adventure will find new information and new angles of vision."-Martin E. Marty, New York Times Book Review 
Amazon
  back

Feynman (1965), Richard P, and Albert P Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, McGraw Hill 1965 Preface: 'The fundamental physical and mathematical concepts which underlie the path integral approach were first developed by R P Feynman in the course of his graduate studies at Princeton, ... . These early inquiries were involved with the problem of the infinite self-energy of the electron. In working on that problem, a "least action" principle was discovered [which] could deal successfully with the infinity arising in the application of classical electrodynamics.' As described in this book. Feynman, inspired by Dirac, went on the develop this insight into a fruitful source of solutions to many quantum mechanical problems.  
Amazon
  back

Kuhn (1996), Thomas S, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, U of Chicago Press 1962, 1970, 1996 Introduction: 'a new theory, however special its range of application, is seldom just an increment to what is already known. Its assimilation requires the reconstruction of prior theory and the re-evaluation of prior fact, an intrinsically revolutionary process that is seldom completed by a single man, and never overnight.' [p 7]  
Amazon
  back

Lonergan (1992), Bernard J F, c(Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan : Volume 3), University of Toronto Press 1992 '. . . Bernard Lonergan's masterwork. Its aim is nothing less than insight into insight itself, an understanding of understanding' 
Amazon
  back

Omnes (2002), Roland, and Arturo Sangalli (translator), Quantum Philosophy: Understanding and Interpreting Contemporary Science, Princeton University Press 2002 From Booklist 'Einstein and Aristotle meet and shake hands in this illuminating exposition of the unexpected return of common sense to modern science. A companion volume to Omnes' earlier Understanding Quantum Mechanics (1999), this book recounts—with mercifully little mathematical detail—how this century's pioneering researchers severed the ties that for millennia had anchored science within the bounds of clear and intuitive perceptions of the world. As an abstruse mathematical formalism replaced the visual imagination, scientists jettisoned normal understandings of cause and effect, of coherence and continuity, setting science adrift from philosophical conceptions going back as far as Democritus. But when theorists recently began to weigh the "consistent histories" of various quantum events, the furthest frontiers of science became strangely familiar, as rigorous logic revalidated much of classical physics and many of the perceptions of common sense. With a contagious sense of wonder, Omnes invites his readers, who need no expertise beyond an active curiosity, to share in the exhilarating denouement of humanity's 2,500-year quest to fathom the natural order. And in a tantalizing conclusion, he beckons readers toward the mystery that still shrouds the origins of formulas that physicists love for their beauty even before testing them for their truth. An essential acquisition for public library science collections.' Bryce Christensen 
Amazon
  back

Popper (1972), Karl Raimund, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul 1972 Preface: 'The way in which knowledge progresses, and expecially our scientific knowledge, is by unjustified (and unjustifiable) anticipations, by guesses, by tentative solutions to our problems, by conjectures. These conjectures are controlled by criticism; that is, by attempted refutations, which include severely critical tests.' [p viii]  
Amazon
  back

Whitehead (1979), Alfred North, Process and Reality (Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of Edinburgh 1927-28), Free Press 1979 'Studied this in college and was totally blown away! Process & Reality is, in a nutshell, mathematics-based, process metaphysics, with quantum mechanics thrown in for good measure. Say that 3 times fast! Given that he wrote this in 1927-28, many of the concepts he proposed were way ahead of the times. The concepts he proposed were similar to Spinoza & Meister Eckhart, although more advanced than either one. I found it fascinating! I was a Philosophy major at the time & this was one of the first texts that really ignited my passion for philosophy & quantum mechanics. I would recommend this to Philosophers, Physicists, and anyone who is just naturally inquisitive about the way the world and its parts work.' Amazon customer Just ME 
Amazon
  back

Links

Al Jazeera and Agencies, ' Pope says Ukraine war ‘a crime against humanity’ in annual speech', ' In his yearly address to diplomats, Pope Francis has denounced Russia’s war in Ukraine, Iran’s treatment of protesters and the damaging of government buildings in Brazil by followers of the country’s far-right ex-president. . . The pope denounced the “wake of death and destruction” caused by Russia’s nearly-year-long offensive in Ukraine, describing the war as “a crime against God and humanity”. . . . Francis condemned Tehran’s use of the death penalty against demonstrators who are demanding greater freedoms for women. . . . In a broader comment on women’s rights globally, the pope said women in many countries are still treated as “second-class citizens”. . . . Francis expressed alarm over a “weakening of democracy” in the Americas, citing the storming of government buildings in Brazil on Sunday by supporters of former populist leader Jair Bolsonaro.' back

Centre for Process Studies, Mission and History, ' Influenced by the work of Alfred North Whitehead and John B. Cobb, Jr., CPS is dedicated to the expansive exploration of ever-new sectors of academia and society through the transformative and ever-transforming tradition of process thinking. Process thinkers engage many different religious traditions and non-religious worldviews, working to both create positive social change and protect the natural environment. Among the Center’s publications are: Process Studies, the leading refereed journal in the field; Process Perspectives, a popular newsmagazine; and multiple series of books and publications stemming from its various projects.; back

Codec - Wikipedia, Codec - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'A codec is a device or computer program capable of encoding or decoding a digital data stream or signal. Codec is a portmanteau of coder-decoder or, less commonly, compressor-decompressor.' back

Damian Thompson (23_01_11), Cardinal Pell’s righteous fury at the Vatican’s theological direction, back

Feynman, Leighton & Sands: FLP I:22, The Feynman Lectures on Physics: I:22 Algebra , ' In our study of oscillating systems we shall have occasion to use one of the most remarkable, almost astounding, formulas in all of mathematics. From the physicist’s point of view we could bring forth this formula in two minutes or so, and be done with it. But science is as much for intellectual enjoyment as for practical utility, so instead of just spending a few minutes on this amazing jewel, we shall surround the jewel by its proper setting in the grand design of that branch of mathematics which is called elementary algebra.' back

George Pell, The Catholic Church must free itself from this ‘toxic nightmare’, 'Shortly before he died on Tuesday, Cardinal George Pell wrote the following article for The Spectator in which he denounced the Vatican’s plans for its forthcoming ‘Synod on Synodality’ as a ‘toxic nightmare’. The booklet produced by the Synod, to be held in two sessions this year and next year, is ‘one of the most incoherent documents ever sent out from Rome’, says Pell. Not only is it ‘couched in neo-Marxist jargon’, but it is ‘hostile to the apostolic tradition’ and ignores such fundamental Christian tenets as belief in divine judgment, heaven and hell. [Damian Thompson] back

George Scialabba, What Were We Thinking: The intolerable inquities we take for granted, ' Unless we have reached the end point of humankind’s moral development, it is pretty certain that the average educated human of the twenty-third century will look back at the average educated human of the twenty-first century and ask incredulously about a considerable number of our most cherished moral and political axioms, “How could they have believed that?” . . . So let’s interrogate some of our beliefs about political morality with the eyes of our descendants. Two four-letter words lie at the heart of contemporary America’s public morality: “free” and “fair.” . . . Our twenty-third-century descendants may ask—they will ask—how we could have tolerated such unfairness; but they won’t ask how we could have believed such inequalities to be fair, because we don’t, most of us, believe them to be fair. Let’s instead consider a different question: whether our present-day ideals of fairness and freedom, even if we lived up to them, would satisfy our descendants.' back

Graham Readfearn, George Pell saw climate science as a dangerous religious dogma – in the end his hardline stance held the church back, 'The late Cardinal George Pell left a legacy of climate science denial which – in his later years – became ever more distanced from reality and the position of the Catholic church. For decades in newspaper columns and speeches, Pell popularised climate denial talking points to dismiss the science of global heating and to brand environmentalists as hysterical and in the grip of a pseudo-religion. In one 2011 interview with Catholic media, Pell said: “In the past, pagans sacrificed animals and even humans in vain attempts to placate capricious and cruel gods. Today, they demand a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions". back

Huygens-Fresnel principle - Wikipedia, Huygens-Fresnel principle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' The Huygens–Fresnel principle (named after Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens and French physicist Augustin-Jean Fresnel) states that every point on a wavefront is itself the source of spherical wavelets, and the secondary wavelets emanating from different points mutually interfere. The sum of these spherical wavelets forms a new wavefront. As such, the Huygens-Fresnel principle is a method of analysis applied to problems of luminous wave propagation both in the far-field limit and in near-field diffraction as well as reflection. ' back

Janusz Bugajski, The benefits of Russia’s coming disintegration, ' We are currently witnessing an unfolding revolution in global security that Western policy makers are clearly unprepared for — the impending collapse of the Russian Federation. Instead of planning contingencies for external spillovers and capitalizing on Russia’s de-imperialization, however, Western officials appear to be stuck in a bygone era, believing they can return to the post-Cold War status quo, with some even offering Moscow security guarantees to keep the country intact. But Russia is a failed state. It’s been unable to transform itself into a nation-state, a civic state or even a stable imperial state. It is a federation in name only, as the central government pursues a policy of ethnic and linguistic homogenization and denies any powers to the country’s 83 republics and regions. . . . ' back

Jeffrey Nicholls (2017), Computing power of a grain of sand: the calculation, Quantum theory has taught us that there is more computing power in a grain of sand than all the computers on the planet. Here is the calculation. We let our grain of sand weigh a microgram. Einstein's formula E = mc2 tells us that this is [equivalent to] (10-9 kilograms) × (3E8 metres per second)2 = 9 ×107 Joules, say 100 million. The Planck-Einstein formula f = E/h relates frequency to energy. Filling in the numbers, f = 108 Joule / (6.63×10-34 Joule-seconds) = ≈ 1041 cycles per second, that is computations per second. If every one of us, about 10 billion, or 1010 has a teraflop computer capable of performing 1012 operations per second the total power is 1022 computations per second, ie about 1019 times slower than the grain of sand. back

Jenny Hocking (23_01_13), When family and firm collide: escaping a royal horror story, ' This relationship and its devastating impact is the focus of the Netflix series, and it makes harrowing viewing. No-one can survive unscathed from such an endless denunciation of their very essence, their character, motivations, and life’s ambitions, as Meghan Markle faced over the last 6 years. It was unrelentingly brutal, a campaign ‘of inarguable racism, sexism and sheer hatefulness’, and the more they kicked back the harder the ‘royal rota’ came. ‘Constantly just picked at by these vultures’ as Diana, whose presence haunts every page of Spare, described it.' back

Laplace's demon - Wikipedia, Laplace's demon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' We may regard the present state of the universe as the effect of its past and the cause of its future. An intellect which at a certain moment would know all forces that set nature in motion, and all positions of all items of which nature is composed, if this intellect were also vast enough to submit these data to analysis, it would embrace in a single formula the movements of the greatest bodies of the universe and those of the tiniest atom; for such an intellect nothing would be uncertain and the future just like the past would be present before its eyes.' A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, Essai philosophique dur les probabilites introduction to the second edition of Theorie analytique des probabilites based on a lecture given in 1794. back

Lara Feigel, After Sappho by Selby Wynn Schwartz review – in praise of visionary women, ' A lot of feminist novelists are looking backwards right now: think of Lauren Groff’s Matrix, set in a 12th-century convent. It’s as if, as women lose their freedoms and their voice in the present, and we face the growing knowledge that things may never truly change, we need to pause to take stock and learn what we can from our ancestors; understanding, as Woolf did, which of our instincts were theirs. In the Sappho-Cassandra dialectic Schwartz brings something new and necessary to the dance across time, and it’s a dialectic in which our embodied lives are central. At once breathlessly, carnally beautiful and doomed to assault by medical neglect and male power, the female body emerges here prepared to fight for itself in endlessly flexible, sensual forms of collectivity. back

Maeve McGregor, https://www.crikey.com.au/2023/01/09/zali-steggall-indigenous-voice-advertising-laws/, ' “I look at the January 6 insurrection as an absolute warning sign to all liberal democracies around the power of misinformation and disinformation,” independent MP Zali Steggall told Crikey.. The Warringah MP said it was largely against this backdrop that she reintroduced a tweaked version of her “Stop the Lies” bill in the final sitting week of Parliament last year. . . . \ “We’re at a really crucial juncture in Australian history and Indigenous reconciliation,” she said of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum. “But many people don’t realise that, unlike in business and commerce, where consumers are protected against misleading and deceptive advertising, it’s perfectly legal to lie in political advertising. It’s just a free-for-all.' back

Matthew Walther, Pope Benedict Wasn’t Conservative. He Was Something Much More Surprising., back

Nicole Lee & Suzanne Nielsen, How does methadone work as a heroin-replacement therapy? And what about the longer-acting buprenorphine?, ' Around one in three people who try heroin become dependent, and around one in five people who use opioids long-term for pain become dependent. Research shows the most effective treatment for heroin dependence is to replace it with a similar but longer-acting opioid – such as methadone – in a controlled dose to reduce the need to use heroin. This is called “opioid agonist treatment”.' . . . Heroin dependence is a health condition and there is very good evidence that receiving any form of opioid agonist treatment saves lives, so it is critical that people can access it when they need it.' back

Noether's theorem - Wikipedia, Noether's theorem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Noether's (first) theorem states that any differentiable symmetry of the action of a physical system has a corresponding conservation law. The theorem was proved by German mathematician Emmy Noether in 1915 and published in 1918. The action of a physical system is the integral over time of a Lagrangian function (which may or may not be an integral over space of a Lagrangian density function), from which the system's behavior can be determined by the principle of least action.' back

P. A. M. Dirac (1933), The Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics, ' . . . there is an alternative formulation [to the Hamiltonian] in classical dynamics, provided by the Lagrangian. This requires one to work in terms of coordinates and velocities instead of coordinates and momenta. The two formulation are closely related but there are reasons for believing that the Lagrangian one is more fundamental. . . . Secondly the lagrangian method can easily be expressed relativistically, on account of the action function being a relativistic invariant; . . .. ' [This article was first published in Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion, Band 3, Heft 1 (1933), pp. 64–72.] back

Paul E. Smaldino & Richard McElreath, The natural selection of bad science, ' Abstract Poor research design and data analysis encourage false-positive findings. Such poor methods persist despite perennial calls for improvement, suggesting that they result from something more than just misunderstanding. The persistence of poor methods results partly from incentives that favour them, leading to the natural selection of bad science. This dynamic requires no conscious strategizing—no deliberate cheating nor loafing—by scientists, only that publication is a principal factor for career advancement. Some normative methods of analysis have almost certainly been selected to further publication instead of discovery. In order to improve the culture of science, a shift must be made away from correcting misunderstandings and towards rewarding understanding. We support this argument with empirical evidence and computational modelling. We first present a 60-year meta-analysis of statistical power in the behavioural sciences and show that power has not improved despite repeated demonstrations of the necessity of increasing power. To demonstrate the logical consequences of structural incentives, we then present a dynamic model of scientific communities in which competing laboratories investigate novel or previously published hypotheses using culturally transmitted research methods. As in the real world, successful labs produce more ‘progeny,’ such that their methods are more often copied and their students are more likely to start labs of their own. Selection for high output leads to poorer methods and increasingly high false discovery rates. We additionally show that replication slows but does not stop the process of methodological deterioration. Improving the quality of research requires change at the institutional level.' back

Ronald Desmet (Stanford Ecyclopedia of Philosophy), Alfred North Whitehead, ' Alfred North Whitehead (1861–1947) was a British mathematician and philosopher best known for his work in mathematical logic and the philosophy of science. In collaboration with Bertrand Russell, he co-authored the landmark three-volume Principia Mathematica (1910, 1912, 1913). Later, he was instrumental in pioneering the approach to metaphysics now known as process philosophy.' back

Slut-shaming - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming, the free encyclopedia, ' Slut-shaming is the practice of criticizing people, especially women and girls, who are perceived to violate expectations of behavior and appearance regarding issues related to sexuality. The term is used to reclaim the word slut and empower women and girls to have agency over their own sexuality. It may also be used in reference to gay men, who may face disapproval for promiscuous sexual behaviors. Slut-shaming rarely happens to heterosexual men. Examples of slut-shaming include being criticized or punished for: violating dress code policies by dressing in sexually provocative ways; requesting access to birth control; having premarital, extramarital, casual, or promiscuous sex; or engaging in prostitution. It can also include being victim-blamed for being raped or otherwise sexually assaulted.' back

Wigner's theorem - Wikipedia, Wigner's theorem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Wigner's theorem, proved by Eugene Wigner in 1931, is a cornerstone of the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics. . . . Ray space, in mathematics known as projective Hilbert space, is the space of all unit vectors in Hilbert space up to the equivalence relation of differing by a phase factor. By Wigner's theorem, any transformation of ray space that preserves the absolute value of the inner products can be represented by a unitary or antiunitary transformation of Hilbert space, which is unique up to a phase factor. As a consequence, the representation of a symmetry group on ray space can be lifted to a projective representation or sometimes even an ordinary representation on Hilbert space.' back

www.naturaltheology.net is maintained by The Theology Company Proprietary Limited ACN 097 887 075 ABN 74 097 887 075 Copyright 2000-2023 © Jeffrey Nicholls