Notes DB 93 Theological Genocide - 2025
Sunday 7 December 2025 - Saturday 13 December 2025
[page 166]
Sunday 7 December 2025
Tweet of the day: Theology is our most important and influential science worldwide but it is based mostly on ancient mythological texts. But the Universe is real, created itself and is here for all of us to see. It is the body of god and reveals the mind of god if we learn to look.[page 167]
Over two thousand years the Bible has transformed most of the human mental world. The purpose of my book is to do the same, to replace the ancient text imagined by our ancient ancestors with the body of the real god whose truth, spoken to us at every moment of our lives, reveals the real mind of God. Nicholls (2025): Cognitive Cosmogenesis: A systematic integration of physics and theology
Letter to Faraday Institute re Cognitive Cosmogenesis:
The statistical output of our quantum mechanical world as measured in Minkowski space is identical to the output of the communication source A modelled by Shannon’s mathematical theory of communication, a set of characters ai whose probabilities pi add up to 1 and whose entropy in bits is given by Σi pi log2 pi. We may interpret this output as a message, and on the hypothesis that the universe is itself divine we may interpret this output as a message from the divinity analogous to the Bible and other ancient theological texts and thus as a source giving us access to the mind of the divinity and an appropriate source for scientific theology.
I examine this idea in my book Cognitive Cosmogenesis: a systematic integration of physics and theology which was drafted as a PhD thesis and I offer it to you for consideration and possible review. It was published on 5 December by Austin Macauley. I do not have a copy yet, but will post you one if you wish when they send it to me.
John D. Norton: Philosophical significance of General Relativity Theory.
Norton: symmetry is the essential notion for realizing the principle of relativity. It is present in special relativity. It is missing in GR. Can we extend Lorentz covariance to general covariance? No.John D. Norton (2022_02_07): Philosophical Significance of the General Theory of Relativity‘The geometric structures that make up spacetime are all that is necessary for a theory of gravity. The idea is implemented in general relativity by making special relativity the special case of flat spacetime [diagonal metric, 4 parameters]. General relativity covers the cases where spacetime is no longer flat and more varied gravitational phenomena appear [upper right corner metric, 10 parameters].
Inertial and accelerated motion remain distinguishable absolutely. Satellite is accelerating but it is [locally] in inertial motion [moving through flat Minkowski spaces].
“The G-field is conditioned and determined by the energy tensor.” What did Einstein tell us? The ten entries in a 4 x 4 matrix are needed to describe the gravitational field in the epoch of the universe when bosons and fermions have come into existence through the bifurcation of zero-energy flat space [primordial, Aquinas–Einstein singularity]. So did gravity arrive with particles bifurcating the zero energy world [the first fruits of quantum mechanics?].
[page 168]
We have to see how this relates to the quantum and logic and maybe at the root we find the not operator, kinetic = not potential, fermion = not boson, kinetic + potential = boson + fermion = 0. But there must be something special in hadrons comprising 2 and 3 quarks.
This is where cognitive theory should come into its own because the renormalization and asymptotic freedom and confinement stories seem a bit weird and we need something new to win the Millennium prize and integrate the quantum and gravity stories. Two years to next book, lust-4-lfe marketed by sex sells, the Sabrina Carpenter book. Carlson, Jaffe & Wiles (2006): The Millennium Prize Problems, Sabrina Carpenter: Manchild
Back to Jaffe and Witton: Fields are a mistake [since spacetime per se does not exist, only particles and their real relationships] because continuity is a mistake, led astray by gravitation which is intrinsically coordinate free [ie zero dimensional topological space described by absolute (“self cancelling”, tensor) differential calculus]. Continuous spacetime does not exist. What is the anti field essay. It comes out of the ten steps and the commentary thereunto: Lust_4_Life.
The 64$ question is how quantum mechanics bifurcates gravitation and how we would like to say that it is the same bifurcation that creates kinetic and potential and also creates bosons and fermions and the reality is all particles and pure mathematical spacetime does not exist in the sense that it is the empty Platonic set of consistency which is a logical thing whose existence is identical to its essence ad both are in effect empty. Making god per se omniscient was a step too far.
Page 130: What does “dA is the gauge covarant deriative of the exterior derivative” mean?
[page 169]
Jaffe and Witten page 131: What does the massless nature of the classical Yang-Mills waves mean? What is the vacuum? Because they mix Hilbert and Minkowski space they lose degrees of freedom that could clean up the mess.
1: Mass gap, every excitation of the vacuum must have energy Δ > 0. Is vacuum Hilbert (no space, time, momentum or energy) or Minkowski: x + t + p + E. Mass gap - Wikipedia
2. Quark confinement, ie binding energy greater than quark mass [the boson is more energetic than the fermion?] Color confinement - Wikipedia
3. Chiral symmetry breaking. Chiral symmetry breaking - Wikipedia
There does not exist a convincing, whether or nat mathematically complete theoretical computation demonstrating any of the three properties in QCD as opposed to a seriously simplified truncation of it. [Jaffee & Witten p 132].
Ie first we have to dream up a plausible structure to hang the maths on.
The false shangri la: a mathematically complete example of a gauge theory in 4D space-time, nor even a precise definition of quantum gauge theory in 4D, BECAUSE quantum theory does not exist in 4D!
page 133: QFT became increasingly central to physics throughout C20: but it is fundamentally mistaken because it restricts QM to Minkowski space. All we really want is naked quantum algorithms to achieve the three points above and we will get them all in the 10 steps (or bust): [they will appear as matrices which superpose certain Hilbert basis vectors to yield the desired result through a self-adjoint operation, ie by superposing them in the right way. Is this how superconductivity works]. Superconductivity - Wikipedia
So Millennium prize to pay for teeth [hopeless dream, but someone has got to do it and I am such an outlier I have a chance].We are talking about body and soul: the soul is the formal structure activated by the body ≡ energy.
[page 170]
Monday 10 December 2025
Ghostly night of dreams perhaps motivated by worries about the reception of my book. Reassured by dependence on physics rather than ancient theologies concocted by sycophantic theologians to please and justify their powerful masters, and the power of science to cut through fiction. Now feel back on the ground and my gravitatioal divinity is working for me. 9.26 make some $$: BAS got gas sales contract with Origin.
David Shoebridge:senator.shoebridge@aph.gov.au
[list of destinations for review copies of my book]
Nambu Nobel page 58: ‘In quantum theory [spontaneous symmetry breaking, ie no energy involved?] becomes also possible for the entire space-time for the “vacuum” is not void but has many intrinsic degrees of freedom. In this context it may an important role in cosmology. As the universe cools down it may undergo one or more SSB transitiona from states of
[page 171]
higher symmetry to lower ones which change the governing laws of physics. Do I believe this? Of course not, like all field theory it is a tangled mess of Hilbert and Minkowski space. Yachiro Nambu (2008): Nobel Lecture: Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Particle Physics: a Case of Cross Fertilization
Tuesday 9 December 2025
Emails to Holy Office and NYT: cultdiv@ccdds.va, editorial@nytimes.com
Re: Cognitive Cosmogenesis: A systematic integration of physics and theology
Your ExcellenciesI am a strong believer in the words of Jesus “Love God, Love Your Neighbour. Consequently, in 1963, I entered the Dominican Order in Australia, was solemnly professed and studied the work of Thomas Aquinas for 5 years. I was impressed by the way Aquinas developed Christian Doctrine with the work of Aristotle and was pleased to see that Aquinas’s work is still central to the doctrine of the faith (Canon 252 section 3). During the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council I suggested to my superiors that the Order should begin a study parallel to this work of Aquinas, investigating the possibilities of the hypothesis that the Universe is divine and that close observation of the real universe can provide a foundation for a scientific theology in tune with modern social expectations for the quality of information released by public corporations such as the Roman Church.
Despite my solemn profession I was expelled from the Order, an event which severely upset my mother who was a very staunch Catholic and was shocked that her gift of her oldest son to the Church was rejected. Apparently my vows were annulled by some Vatican paperwork but the Order has failed to release any information to me about the reasons for my treatment. I consider this an abuse of power tantamount to severe intellectual and personal abuse. Hopefully, as the Church brings its sexual abuse of children under control, it will be forced to turn its attention intellectual and spiritual abuse.
In the 60 years since that time, I have written the book mentioned in the subject line above which was launched last Friday 5 December. My book makes a powerful scientific case for theology based on the physical reality of the world rather that on ancient texts composed long before we had any knowledge of the size and magnificence of the Universe.
Here is a very brief summary of my work submitted to the British Faraday Institute for Science and Religion:
The statistical output of our quantum mechanical world as measured in Minkowski space is identical to the output of the communication source A modelled by Shannon’s mathematical theory of communication, a set of characters ai whose probabilities pi add up to 1 and whose entropy in bits is given by Σi pi log2 pi. We may interpret this output as a message, and on the hypothesis that the universe is itself divine we may interpret this output as a message from the divinity analogous to the Bible and other ancient theological texts. We thus have a source giving us access to the mind of the divinity and an appropriate source for scientific theology.
I examine this idea in my book Cognitive Cosmogenesis: a systematic integration of physics and theology which was drafted as a PhD thesis. I offer it to you for consideration and possible review. It was published on 5 December by Austin Macauley.
I hope you will obtain copies of my book, bring it to the attention of the Pontifical Academy of science, and provide a substantial response to my thesis.
One approach is to expose the RCC as a scam based on imperial power rather than truth. Make this a tweet of the day? Another tweet: Today I emailed the Holy office to warn them out my book.
[put them together] . The Roman Catholic Church serves about 18% of the world population as a scam based on imperial power rather than truth. Make this a tweet of the day? Another tweet: Today I emailed the Holy office to warn them out my book. I hope you will obtain copies of my book, bring it to the attention of the Pontifical Academy of science, and provide a substantial response to my thesis.
Email books@theguardian, reviews@the guardian [not done]
Rapa Nui showed that even entrenched mysteries yield to systematic investigation. Carl Lipo (2025_11_27): Drones, physics and rats: Studies show how the people of Rapa Nui made and moved the giant statues – and what caused the island’s deforestation
[page 172]
I feel proud and happy about my ten steps for L4L but I am finding it very hard to write the commentary, the feeling is there but not the words, trying to thread the way through all the confusion embedded in the quantum field theory by mixing Hilbert and Minkowski space. The question how does energy make a quantum form into a particle is analogous to how does a body make a soul into a person. As far as I know, I do not have an immortal soul but the Aquinas–Einstein singularity is in effect exactly that, an eternal structureless existent. We escape the body-soul question by the ancient definition of simplicity that asserts that essence and existence are identical in god and it seems reasonable to take the ancient theological idea over into physics as the first step in fashioning particles by explaining how the form and the body cohabit, ie that energy animates the form to act in the way that the form demands, just as feeding petrol into a stationary internal combustion engine and starting it makes it run as long as the fuel lasts and the forms and tolerances of its parts remain intact. Now I need to go out for a walk (ie do the bins). In my 40 years in Elands I worked for 5 hours a day and thought for the other 12 and this was a good balance.
The components of an engine are the top of a long chain of forces which shape the particles from which they are made from elementary particles through molecules, crystals, and other solid state structures that yield a part which can maintain its form with sufficient precision to interact constructively with all the other parts of the engine to make it work, ie maintain the recurrent cycle of events which we call running, perfectly analogous to the reproductive process in living systems. This we might call green behaviour, not stressing systems beyond their limits so that they can continue to reproduce their designed and designated behaviour.
[page 173]
Things are coming out now. Field theory imagines an ubiquitous superposition of fields which occupy the whole of spacetime, by which they mean Minkowski space. We are not told where these fields came from, presumably put in place by the creator and they are continuous in the calculus sense and do not appear to interact with one another so we cannot see them as elements of Hilbert space. In their relaxed [vacuum??] state they do not represent any particles. The energy to make particles is imagined to arise through uncertainty [vacuous fluctuations?] in other words the vacuum is raised to a higher energy by quantum ‘vibrations’ [presumably creating energy from nothing].
Now I need to check this story against sources of quantum field theory which I take to be Auyang, Weinberg and Zee with a touch of Dirac and Feynman so I can write this out as a succinct and accurate subset of cl4l_05_particles. Another step forward. Then we go back to Hilbert space in the singularity and quantum mechanics as the genetic process that produces the forms (ie vectors, wave functions) that serve as the input to the universe, the basis states generated in the initial singularity by Brouwer’s fixed point theorem and computable functions. Sunny Auyang (1995): How is quantum Field Theory Possible?, Stever Weinberg (1995): The Quantum Theory of Fields Volume I: Foundations , Anthony Zee (2010): Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell, P A M Dirac (1983): The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (4th ed)
So for the moment back to Jaffe and Witten, looking for a story a bit like the paragraph above.
Jaffe + co: “The most important QFTs are gauge theories.” What is a gauge theory: Wiki: ‘In physics a gauge theory is a type of field theory in which the Lagrangian is invariant under local tranformations from certain Lie Goups’.
A Lie group is a group which is also a differentiable manifold, ie continuous and therefore unreal.
[page 174]
Yang + Mills page 192 ‘gauge change = phase change’. Chen Ning Yang & Robert L. Mills (1954_06_28): Isotopic spin conservation and a generalized gauge invariance
Since Ψ may be defined on x, y, z, and t, the relative phase factor of Ψ at 2 different points is therefore completely arbitrary (because when Hilbert space is independent of Minkowski space, there is no x, y, z, and t, in Hilbert space).
By ditching quantum field theory I have created a sea of troubles for myself but the time will come when the problems are solved and the beautiful clarity of the independence of Hilbert space from Minkowski space will pay for itself in the way that it has already opened the way to a union physics and theology which remains more of a hunch than a proof but the union of quantum mechanics and communication will sort this out. Another possibility verging on the edges of my consciousness is that the non-linearity of Yang-Mills will disappear when we do away with the interference of special relativity. The key is that because Hilbert space has no space and time the Lorentz transformation is necessary to maintain the independence of Hilbert space from Minkowski space because for Hilbert space all the different spacetime points are the same, as the Lorentz transformation shows.
How do we apply the idea to Yang-Mills (after we have already thrown renormalization out the door). We have to get deeper into the boson – fermion distinction as it applies in QCD. I say all this without really knowing what it all means as may be the case when people write poetry and play music — it could be anything, like quantum mechanics,
[page 175]
ie as a wave field quantum mechanics is like music and poetry, it can mean anything when it is tied down [given context] in Minkowski space in the same way as the Church ties down the Bible and music to constrain it to the official interpretation. So apply this to the containment of energy in fundamental particles which is effect the containment of the variety of quantum mechanics as different life forms contain the possibilities of genetic variation.
Wednesday 10 December 2025
VUL offer closes 23/12
What we are seeking are simple clear explanations without too many demanding prerequisites which implement the principles of simplicity and ‘courtroom entropy’ ie explanations of the same complexity as the reality explained [starting from an empty “transcendent” singularity about which nothing can be said besides “it exists”].
Auyang: Page 4: Feynman: ‘We always have a great deal of difficulty in understanding the world view that quantum mechanics represents.’ Hidebound by Minkowski space intellectualism rather than music?
‘The phenomenalist doctrines are espoused by the Copenhagen School that dominates quantum interpretation and are academically influential . . .’.
page 5. Many physicists find that that the chief philosophical issues concern the reality of the microscopic world, the objectivity of quantum theories and the relation of the world to our experiences. Auyang (1995): How is quantum Field Theory Possible?
[page 176]
The ladder of creation [begins with the] empty [but real, physical] reality (singularity) generates [abstract] form which is generates reality which generates force. In this way we accommodate the reality that information is physical and also the source of creation, the form/energy/ bootstrap [every layer creates new forms which attract energy to become a new layer, like the idea [form] of steam engines directs energy into making steam engines]. Thomas Newcomen - Wikipedia
Thursday 11 December 2025
Copy to USCCB - time to fight back against fake news
The specific feature of the Einstein universe is that it is a continuous, compact, convex space with the Minkowski metric. To make this universe possible we have to explain the Minkowski space and we do this with a combination of Hilbert space, quantum mechanics and the formation of a particulate communication network with zero sum bifurcation [which creates fermions and bosons]. The quickest way to see this is with the Einstein Hilbert Lagrangian in that T [fermion] − V [boson] = 0. Einstein-Hilbert action - Wikipedia
This goes in the essay on Justice, sequel to quantocracy.
The fundamental create discovery is the form / reality bootstrap, form, investment. construction = quantum mechanics / [bifurcation of gravitation /] energy. Space is a network of nodes (fermions, spin ½, bosons spin 1) [idea first documented on non-quantum mechanical 2019 honours thesis Prolegomena to scientific theology].
We understand this through the Lagrangian and stationarity — stationary = hermitian [real] = self-adjoint, ie motion is cancelled, fixed point theory [provides a similar answer].
[page 177]
My book [Nicholls 2025] is a positive outcome of childhood intellectual abuse [by the Church]. Nicholls (2025): Cognitive Cosmogenesis: a systematic integration of theology and physics
Quantum intelligence, working in 2D Hilbert space created [the forms of] bosons and fermions, the fundamental network [elements] of the universe. Now I should read my honours thesis again, putting it in [its proper] quantum context. It was the beginning of the network view [which I had harboured since I started to write Welcome to natural theology. [See it in the wayback machine Naturaltheology.net, 2001]
Michael Falk: Michael Falk (2025_12_11): ‘Artificial intelligence’ myths have existed for centuries – from the ancient Greeks to a pope’s chatbot
Reading the Five Books of Moses I see that Yahweh the god of Israel is a greedy stupid old power tripping narcissist like Donald Trump who destroys everything that he touches by cowering before greedy fools. Robert Alter (2004): The Five Books of Moses: A Translation with Commentary
We have to extend the physical ideas of symmetry to people as I have tried to do in quantocracy and must now complete justice. I vaguely see a target but first I must deal with the field theory and this accounts for the agonizingly slow birth of L4L. The interpretation of the physical nature of information and the form energy bootstrap have been significant steps I think, and just need to push on through the ten steps and the commentary. cl4l05_particles is slowly coming into focus and feeding back some enlightenment to cl4l01 → 04.
Friday 12 December 2025
Why am I so optimistic? The overall simplicity of my Ansatz to have Hilbert space on the initial singularity derived from Augustine’s Trinity and Brouwer’s fixed point theorem releasing the full power of quantum mechanical variation and selection. [This is] based on a simple understanding of QM based on de Broglie waves and superposition, eliminating the unphysical ideas of QFT which appear to be derived from the traditional story of an omniscient creator setting the universe on a restricted and deterministic trajectory of development. This plus the energy-form bootstrap opens a clear path to a self creating divine universe. Now to make it stick beyond the advantages mentions in Cognitive Cosmogenesis.
USCCB office of the General Counsel: http:www.usccb.org/ogc/
Hi, I am aware that the Church is slowly responding to its long history of child sexual abuse. My interest is the child intellectual abuse now revealed by scientific assessments of Catholic doctrine.This doctrine led me to join the Dominican Order since I found masturbation irresistible and the claim that masturbation is a mortal sin clealy make it impossible for me to reach heaven without extreme superogation.
This doctrine is clearly false and blighted half my life from age 5
I have now, aged 81, written a book Cognitive Cosmogenesis: a systematic integration of physics and theology. I point out in meticulous detail that the reality of physical universe replaces the Bible and that Catholic doctrine is egregeously false.
This book is a foundation for legal action against the Church for knowingly propagating false witness, breaching the Decalogue. I am a Christian: I love god, I love my neighbour.
Best wishes,
Jeffrey Nicholls
More detail at www.naturaltheology.net
Tweet: @USCCB: Dear @USCCB Publication on 5 December 2025 of my book Cognitive Cosmogenesis: a systematic integration of physics and theology marks the end of the Roman Catholic Church as you have it. Please read and adjust your doctrine to real science. I love the true God .
A speech is a periodic vector in sound. When I am making as speech I spread a perodic vector over time, a sequence of events, breaking it down into its basis phonemes.
The most difficult point I have to overcome in cl4l05_particles is to explain how all the features of particles and their interactions in Minkowski space create the details of special
[page 179]
relativity when QM contains no space and time. Where do these come from? This difficulty probably explains why it was a lot easier for the creators of traditional quantum theory to simply assume the existence and work from there as we see even in the proponents of axiomatic quantum field theory like Streater and Wightman. Here we run up against Chaitin’s entropic interpretation of Gödel’s incompleteness results suggesting that if the information is not in quantum theory it cannot be in Minkowski space. A central issue which will determine the structure of cl4l05_. Gregory J. Chaitin (1982): Gödel's Theorem and Information
Saturday 15 December 2025
Aquinas’s god is omnipotent in the same way that Hilbert’s formalism is omnipotent, able to be anything that is non self-contradictory. Formalism (philosophy of mathematics) - Wikipedia
There’s nothing about love in the Nicene Creed. It is just a bit of bureaucratic formalism, a law. Love is concrete, form and energy.
Behiel: Dirac equation: Its most interesting feature is its linearity, so we have to get rid of the quadratic elements. So we take the square root and are going to force the square root to be linear.
Matrices can be used to get rid of the cross terms, γμpμ = mc
Dirac equation: [γμ∂μ + mc/ℏ] ψ = 0.
This means that ψ has 4 components – a bispinor with 4 complex numbers at each point in spacetime, spin up and down, electron and positron.
[page 180]
What we have is two coupled spinors at each point in spacetime. Spinors give us double cover in rotation.
Michael Atiyah: No one fully understands spinors, square roots of geometry ,at the core of fundamental physics – in Minkowski space. Goddard (1998); Paul Dirac, The Man and His Work
Are spinors the bases of stable matter – Pauli exclusion. No it is quantum physics and self-adjoint operators.
Behiel: Why do spinors exist in the first place? Rotations in 3D.
Topology, homology, simply connected, homology class: same topology. Simply connected can shrink to a point, winding number, No cut the loop.
Axis angle representation (Gauss?) no Euler.
Spinor is the 2 component complex vector that an SU(2) matrix acts upon, very like qubit and fermion + boson.
Inverse of SU(2) is determinant 1 and inverse is complex conjugate transpose = hermitian = unitary.
How many degrees of freedom does a spinor have? 3, since length of spinor is 1, so we have 4D hyperspace radius 1. Hypersphere is simply connected. Is SU(2) connected to SO(3)? Yes, double cover.
All this stuff has to do with how quantum mechanics in a
[page 181]
qubit produces fermions and bosons which give the backbone of Minkowski space.
Spinors double cover 3D Euclidean space so rotations in 3D can be covered by SU(2). Spinors for each SO(3) orientation are negatives of one another,
Dirac created 4D equation, but perhaps we can take it to 2D, fermion and boson, ψ = a|fermion⟩ + b|boson⟩.
4D space is ‘covered’ by fermions and bosons.
Dirac equation is gorgeous, introducing spinors, antimatter and respecting the linearity of quantum mechanics, but physics still had to develop quantum field theory to deal with relativity and introduce a load of unfounded assumptions that have proven problematic:
Continuity vs uncertainty principle / fields created ad hoc
renormalization
fluctuation and cosmological constant problem
intractability of gravitation
non-linear Yang-Mills and renormalization to explain asymptotic freedom and confinement, a bit bogus and ad hoc
infinite feynman diagrams
no explanation of spacetime / saved by Lgrangian.
[page182]
So I finish the evening mildly depressed because my theoretical dreams are coming true too slowly but the job is going well and we are getting the power of quantum mechanics out into the open with a countable infinity of basis states matching the lengths of DNA strands controlling life forms which are at least as complex as quantum mechanics. There is quantum mechanics beneath all this DNA. The network model is slowly coming alive again running on bosons and fermions and their power of simplicity is keeping me strong.
