![]()
vol 2: Synopsis part IV: Divine dynamics page 25: God
Site map
1: About
Next: page 26: Goedel
|
This site is part of the natural religion project The natural religion project A new theology A commentary on the Summa The theology company
GodCan God make a stone too big for himself to lift? This ancient conundrum points to the only possible restriction on the nature of God: consistency. Here, by God, we mean the whole of reality. Is reality divided into two, God and the universe? or is it one, simply God. We take the latter view, and ask all the classical questions about God, its size, power, knowledge, durability, and so on. Our working definition is that God is everything. God is as big as can be. Thomas Aquinas produced a number of proofs for the existence of God which all boil down to a similar argument: the visible world of human experience is not everything. It cannot account for itself, therefore there must be some invisible entity, called God, which creates and sustains it. These proofs all depend on the models of God and the world that Thomas had inherited from Aristotle. If the models are wrong, the proof may be wrong as well. Cosmology and observational astronomy tell us that the universe is immense - so big in fact that no observer, no matter how placed, can see more than a small fraction of it. Quantum field theory tells us that this sheer physical size is not all. The universe also possesses microscopically detailed structure whose smallest spacetime elements are measured by Planck's constant. Behind this again, we postulate a function space of transfinite complexity which we use to simulate the actual 'works' of the universe. Our hypothesis is that the universe is as big as can be, and is therefore fittingly called God. As Thomas used models to prove that the universe is not God, we must base our argument that the universe is God on a model. The model we will use is called the transfinite network. It has as its basis the transfinite sets developed by Georg Cantor. We have already noted how Cantor's set theory forms the basis for quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is an abstract mathematical model which has been developed to explain the microscopic operations of the universe. Like all abstract mathematical models, it is not confined to the context in which it was developed, but has a potential infinity of applications. This suggests that the quantum formalism can apply in many situations other than the physics of very small particles. In this section, we set out to develop a model of God in its full abstract generality. The only constraint we can reasonably place on God is that it be consistent, that is not self contradictory. This requirement of consistency is reminiscent of the via negativa used in theology to show not what God is, but what God is not. A similar idea is present in mathematics in proofs by reduction ad absurdum. By showing that the negation of a proposition is false, one establishes that the proposition itself must be true. The twentieth century saw an explosion in mathematics arising from Cantor's work. We now go on to exploit these ideas to produce a formal model of God. Then, in the final section of this synopsis, we apply this model to the universe of experience to arrive at the conviction that it is not inconsistent to call the world God. Books
|
Click on an "Amazon" link in the booklist at the foot of the page to buy the book, see more details or search for similar items
Related sites:
Concordat Watch Revealing Vatican attempts to propagate its religion by international treaty Copyright: You may copy this material freely provided only that you quote fairly and provide a link (or reference) to your source.
|
next: page 26: Goedel previous: page 24: Cosmology |