![]()
vol 2: Synopsis part IV: Divine dynamics page 30: Network
Site map
1: About
Next: page 31: Physics
|
... to restore theology to the mainstream of science
The transfinite network
We can imagine any organisation as a filing system and a set of processes for updating the files. This businesslike idea is here expanded, using Cantor's theory of transfinite cardinal and ordinal numbers, into an infinite abstract structure we call the transfinite network. We assemble a selection of the mathematical, physical and philosophical ideas developed so far into a model large enough to talk about God, but with sufficient finesse to deal with every detail of the world, no matter how small. We are looking for a language or space to describe God. By God we mean here the whole. We can only imagine two constraints on the nature of God. The first is consistency. God must be consistent with itself. The second is size. Cantor's theorem shows us that a consistent symbolic system as large as the natural numbers will grow without limit into the transfinite cardinal and ordinal numbers. This space, we postulate, is large enough to begin to model God. Every point in it is represented by a unique number, that is, a unique ordered set, or ordered set of ordered sets, of whatever symbols we choose to use to represent the natural numbers. Transitions from point to point are made by reordering sets, that is by permutations. Permutations are performed by computers. Turing, one of the inventors of the computer, envisaged two types of machine which he called a (for automatic) machines and o (for oracle) machines. A-machines are deterministic, in the sense that once they are started they follow a definite course until they either halt (if their initial configuration is computable) or not (if the initial configuration is not computable). O-machines, on the other hand, go through a certain number of steps until they come to a point where they consult an 'oracle', which tells them what to do next. In modern terms, we would call them network machines. One would expect an o-machine to be more powerful than an a-machine since it has the oracle to help it. The machines populating the transfinite network are o-machines. Most real computers are o-machines. My computer spends most of its time doing nothing, waiting for me to input another keystroke. The user is the oracle. Since the transfinite network is taken as a model of the whole universe, every o-machine within it has, in principle, the ability to consult all the other machines, and can thus tap the power of the whole network. This is the first step in a recursive process, since we can imagine that once each machine has learnt everything all the others have to teach it, this new generation of more powerful machines can begin another round of consultation. And so on without end. The power of an o-machine depends on its place in the recursive hierarchy of the network. The transfinite net has an infinite hierarchy, and so allows for the existence of machines of unlimited power. This abstract network provides us a huge space for modelling reality, beginning with physics. Books
|
Click on an "Amazon" link in the booklist at the foot of the page to buy the book, see more details or search for similar items
Related sites:
Concordat Watch Revealing Vatican attempts to propagate its religion by international treaty
|
next: page 31: Physics previous: page 29: Quantum information theory |
| This page was last built on 12/9/07; 4:24:51 PM by jhn. tnrp@bigpond.com |