Natural Theology

We have just published a new website that develops the ideas of this site. Available at Cognitive Cosmology.com.

Contact us: Click to email

Notes DB 94: Theory of Peace

Sunday 22 March 2026 - Saturday 28 March 2026

[page 1]

Sunday 22 March 2026

How do we concert an unbridled lust for power into a peaceful society? Where does the unbridled lust for power come from in the first place? We have a political model, the rise and a fall of empires and a scientific model, evolution and the creation of the world. Both revolve around “god”, the implementation of unbridled power in an eternal omnipotent creator.

How did this work out in my life. I was born a lustful creature and taught that my lust was a sin that would keep my out of heaven [a well established theological delusion]. Instead of transforming my lust into love and the creation of children, I was directed into becoming a servant of god by following the ‘counsels of perfection’: taking vows of poverty, chastity and obedience, renouncing my ownership of property, the power of reproduction and my own freedom and agency in the service of a ‘higher’ power. Evangelical counsels - Wikipedia

I could not conform and was rejected, beginning my lifelong search, reflected in this long series of diaries, an unconventional life, a book rejecting the ideology that led me into the service of the imperial Roman Catholic Church, and the present moment. [Here I am] seeking a second reading of the lessons contained in our scientific knowledge of the evolution of the world, a process that has taken 14 billion years to create me and my forest of concerns, highlighted once again by the political system that sees another empire destroying itself in a pointless war. Jeffrey Nicholls (2025): Cognitive Cosmogenesis: A systematic unification of physics and theology, Jason Reifler (2026_03_25): Iran war lacks strategy, goals, legitimacy and support – in the US and around the world

[page 2]

I can now say that I have settled on a hypothesis that solves my problems in principle and am now seeking to sell the book and put my solution into action and have [considered] a legal approach, creating a case that the Catholic Church deprived my of my human right by teaching me false doctrine, that is by requiring me to hold certain opinions that were inconsistent with the world as we know it. My case is a matter of justice.

Foster page 21: Australian case: Latham CJ: What is religion to one is superstition to another. Associate Professor Neil Foster (2020): Respecting the Dignity of Religious Organisations: When is it appropriate for Courts to decide Religious Doctrine?

page 23: Australian cases deciding theological questions: Are beliefs about sexuality parts of Christian Doctrine? Does the Bible say so?

page 31: Uhlman v Live Group

Foster page 44: ‘This paper has considered the extent to which courts should be involved in making decisions about religious doctrines. . . . there are some broad areas where the community has to determine that religious right cannot override other fundamental rights'. Now back to the Theory of Peace essay [see end of notes March 15].

The foundation of the case against the Church begins with its claims on the ownership of God and leads to lies about original sin: Catechism §§2475 sqq. Catholic Catechism: §2475 sqq.: III. Offenses Against Truth

[page 3]

One nation as a party of grievance and disruption? It is an idea for me. No, I am a good news prophet, salvation in a truly divine universe by straightforward science.

Monday 23 March 2026

Phone: We imagine that Hilbert space can break the symmetry of the initial singularity by analogy to the way Augustine developed the Trinity in the singular god Yahweh, placing no limit on th number of persons. Insert to Theory of Peace. Mary Sirridge (1999): Quam videndo intus dicimus: Seeing and Saying in De Trinitate XV

Print 5 copies of ToP, 6pp.

Tuesday 24 March 2026

Caught up with the diary at last and impressed by the web statistics of Scientific-theology.com, the four leaf clover rainbow .

Now back to Justice [L4L_e02_Justice_Mar2026], the sharing of work and reward beginning from the classical definition of energy, the ability to do work, ie E = F.s [F = force, s = distance], and going to the QED approach which is that action is the time integral of energy and energy (matter) is what makes forms real. We structure this article on the standard approach: classical = kinetic = observable; quantum is invisible but explains what we observe in terms of phase, waves, superposition and passage from complex to real numbers.

[page 4]

My monastic experience was cut down because my brilliant idea [of Divinity] was heresy, expressed in the question How Universal is the Universe first phrased in the language of information and communication which has brought me, over 60 years to the notion, mediated by mathematics and quantum mechanics, that the physical universe is the new Bible. As Monty Python said, It is written, that's why, and Hammurabi had the idea of making the writing real and concrete by carving it in stone. Jeffrey Nicholls (1967): How universal is the universe?

My 60yo brilliant idea has finally made it into a book backed by a gigabyte of websites that probably contain abut 100 MB of unique text at say 10B per word, ie 10m million words, a resource that I must conserve for the rest of my life and hopefully arrange for its permanent funding [an idea: duplicate these notes as “Sources” in scientific-theology.com and cognitivecosmogenesis.com]

Wilderness is self sustaining and the most peaceful state of maximum entropy.

Best option: go to Rome and lobby the Papacy [??].

It took physicists a long time to convince themselves that atoms are real but the discovery of the nucleus set the process on its way. What the theologians need to accept is that the initial singularity / symmetry (call it god if you wish) is real and must logically be eternal. A further consequence of this is that the quantum of action is real [an image of the singularity] and is the basis of all Hilbert spaces, and fulfils Aquinas’s claim that god acts at every point in the universe. Aquinas, Summa I, 22, 2: Does everything come under divine providence?

[page 5]

The fundamental weakness of empire is the internal tension caused by injustice which arises from the suppression of the freedom and agency of the people living in the empire, or at least the majority subject to the will of the emperor or imperial power maintained by violence which if severe enough leads to civil war within the imperium.

. . .

Justice - John Rawls A Theory of Justice John Rawls - Wikipedia, A Theory of Justice - Wikipedia

Looking back on my life I see that my indoctrination by the Church totally distorted my relationship with women. The most embarrassing event occurred when some of my friends organized for me to meet a young woman who was to be my partner at the [Blackfriars] prefects’ ball. I did not go to the meeting, perhaps out of fear and embarrassment and went to the ball alone, which was also fearful snd embarrassing and somehow deeply connected to my choice to enter the Order, perhaps also containing an element of fear of women. Subsequently my relationships to the mothers of my children have also been very poor, although I tried. It is only now that my rejection of Catholic doctrine is meticulously documented that I begin to experience the pain that it caused me, in a way completely derailing me from the life I could have had as a well educated, intelligent and socially literate child. One hopes for some significant payoff for all this religious difficulty

[page 6]

akin to the psychological trauma suffered by children who have been sexually abused by the priesthood, although I never really identified with this, but one can say that I did receive the intellectual abuse that was [and is] standard business as usual in the Church. The principal personal role of my theory of peace is to bring peace in my own life. One would hope that this emotional pressure will eventually pay off in the insights that I suspect lie on the periphery of my vision.

Cognitive Cosmogenesis bridges the gnostic gap notes 25M12D14 line 654.

Dirac 2/2/1928 paper on relativistic quantum theory of Zeeman effect. P. A. M. Dirac (1928_02_02): The Quantum Theory of the elecron Part II

Let us say that quantum mechanics separates kinetic energy from potential energy, where we think of kinetic energy in massive fermions and potential energy in massless photons, One expects, however, to find a lot more energy in a fermion than a photon, which is a worry [but may be the case in the expanding universe, where many photons are “cooled” by climbing out of gravitational potential well].

Given that the initial singularity / symmetry is a quantum of action [Aquinas’s actus purus] and energy is the frequency of actions, ie the number of actions per unit time, we are inclined to think of a quantum of action as eternal, [in effect] containing “cancelling” times going in opposite directions, so we see kinetic energy as “positive going” time and potential energy as “negative going” time. [quantum mechanics realizes time and anti-time in the creation of massive and massless particles; masslessness corresponds to the speed of light which is an ingredient in the Minkowski metric, ie in pure quantum mechanics there is no space and time and everything moves the speed of light. This suggests that stationary massivity is in some way the source of space, couple to spin ½; there is mystery here which might reveal something eventually].

Pais page 234. For atom x, mx = Zmp + (A - Z)mn - B/c2 where B is binding energy, potential energy to put in to take nucleus apart (launching an astronaut) somehow navigating negative flowing time. Sleep on it.

[page 7]

Zero energy = formal = immaterial, initial singularity [which we consider, nevertheless, to be real like the quantum of action]. Complex time, time and space, matter and form, a little patch of difficulty which underlies Minkowski space, fermions and bosons [no wonder QFT people assume Minkowski space is given by the creator]. Is there an answer to this dilemma, as there was an answer for the Bohr atom, although this looked grim for a long time? Here we have a rerun of Aristotle’s hylomorphism problem flavoured with the gnostic gap.

Wednesday 25 March 2026

My monastic dream was to rewrite Aquinas’s Summa using modern science in place of Ancient Aristotle. This plan was cut short by the residual influence in the Roman Catholic Church of the Ancient Hebrew divinity Yahweh who would kill rather than be replaced by a new god. Even the universe was not acceptable, so his Church expelled me.

My book Cognitive Cosmogenesis replaces the Cosmological treatment of divinity in the Prima Pars and I am now beginning work on II I, II II, and III, the human place in the world, moral theology and politics and salvation to be mapped out in a website Lust-4-Life. Since humanity is so much part of the biological and physical wold and we have done away with angels, devils and original sin, this task is greatly simplified and strenthened by the fact that quantum mechanics is a comprehensive theory of everything which produces a framework for human and all other life.

[page 8]

Trump and Papacy are both deeply embedded in the post truth world. Alex Lo (2026_03_24): Donald Trump is the purest symbol of post-truth America

Massless particles like photons are superposable and therefore similar to vectors in Hilbert space, outside space and time, only identifiable by their source and destination.

What do scientists do when their research is going nowhere? At least most of them have a parallel teaching job and are aware of the evolutionary fact that not all trials lead to a positive outcome. I do not explicitly teach and whatever I am looking for is still not in hand, but while I am alive my only option is to keep searching. I am saddened [for him] by Einstein’s failure to find a deterministic theory of everything, but I feel that my writing of the music of the spheres in quantum mechanics and a plausible story of the creation of the world is yielding at least enough fruit to keep me going on happily. The best product I have to offer is that the world is ok, divinely perfect if only we lean to trust it and ourselves, right — the Theory of Peace.

The glory of god shines through the universe at all scales from the quantum of action to supernovas, galaxies and massive black holes, each operating with quantum precision that we pick up with out most powerful microscopes like the Large Hadron Collider to our most powerful telescopes whose primary mirrors are slowly growing to tens of metres and planet sized assemblies of radio telescopes. ELT Home: The Extremely Large Telescope; Home, LIGO Scientific Collaboration & Virgo Collaboration

[page 9]

Pais 251: 6 revolutionary theoretical papers: Planck, Einstein, Bohr, Bose, Heisenberg and Schrödinger: ‘If these papers have one thing in common it is that they contain at least one theoretical step that could not be justified st the time of writing.’

My unjustified theoretical steps:

1. Equate singularity to Aristotle, Averroes, Augustine, Aquinas, Planck action model of god.

2. Putting Hilbert space in the initial singularity by Augustine and fixed point theory, introducing non-causality and chance.

3. Automatically introducing quantum mechanics by the superposition of complex vectors, getting real results by hermitian operations.

4. Zero sum complexification of gravitation to introduce kinetic and potential energy which realized qubits of orthogonal bosons and fermions,

5. The construction of inertial and Minkowski space through the intersection of fermions and bosons.

6. Introducing political freedom and agency at all scales via symmetry with respect to complexity in Hilbert space. <./p>

7. Introducing the politics of justice by exact equivalence of kinetic and potential energy created by bifurcation, and the conservation of energy.

[8. Solution to the measurement problem by recognizing the interactions between particles are not just one off collisions but conversations, where the whole spectrum of interactions constitutes a unitary conversation between particles which thought the Born rules meets the criterion of information transmission implicit in Shannon’s communication theory. Wojciech Hubert Zurek (2008): Quantum origin of quantum jumps: breaking of unitary symmetry induced by information transfer and the transition from quantum to classical]

Heisenberg: ‘The present paper seeks to establish a basis for theoretical quantum mechanics founded exclusively upon relationships between quantities which in principle are observable.' And here lies the problem because only a very abstract picture of quantum mechanics is carried across from the complex world to the real world by hermitian operators that hide the complexity of complex numbers. The ‘spiritual’ complex grace is hidden.

[page 10]

Pais, 256: Born: ‘It is necessary to drop completely the physical pictures of Schrödinger which aim at representation of the classical continuum theory to retain only the formalism and fill it with new physical content’. [Which is where QFT fails by immediately reintroducing the continuum Minkowski space and treating it as real and operational rather than as just the screen created by quantum particles on which the quantum images are projected.]

Thursday 26 March 2026

Badlani paid 10k, anaesthetist 2,2k; Badlani returns 5k, no implants [then Friday operation moved to April 24].

L4L_e02_Mar2026: The role of justice as a theory of peace; the fundamental source of war is the failure of justice. Putin: The USSR an imperial power destroyed by its own internal failure [of justice] which he wants to make great again, MAGA, MRGA. [Justice is embedded in the population: Jean Decety and Keith J. Yoder (2016_11_16): The Emerging Social Neuroscience of Justice Motivation

There is a tension between kinetic energy and potential energy which is some way established by quantum mechanics which begins with randomness like evolution and every now and then events ratchet into stability by reproduction, the simplest of which is a harmonic oscillator, a vibrating nothing like a pendulum where the boson and the fermion are identical, energy / mass.

Wriggling toward the idea that bosons (photons or any massless boson) are superposable and may be considered as basis states for a Hilbert space so they can be assembled in different ways, maybe to create fermions, so, eg, we can superpose photons of different frequency to make fermions like electrons (if the energy is there);

[page 11]

ie electron and positron can annihilate into photons,

Feynman and Weinberg: Dirac Memorial Lectures 1996, Foreword John C Taylor:

The development if quantum mechanics began at the turn of the century but it was Dirac in 1925 and 1926 brought the subject to its definitive form, making a theory as compelling as Newton’s mechanics had been.

Dirac immediately set about reconciling quantum theory with Einstein’s special theory of relativity (of 1905). The nature of the marriage between the two marvellous theories, and the fruits of that union, have been the constant preoccupation of fundamental physics from 1925 to the present. . . .

[Feynman’s] lecture here . . . expounds the physical reality underlying Dirac’s prediction of antimatter. Then Weinberg and the unity of EM and weak force. Feynman & Weinberg (1999): Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics: The 1986 Dirac Memorial Lectures

page 2: Feynman:

At first Dirac thought that the spin or the intrinsic angular momentum that the equation demanded was the key and that spin was the fundamental consequence of relativistic quantum mechanics. However, the puzzle of negative energies that these equations presented, when it was solved, showed that the crucial idea to wed quantum mechanics and relativity was the existence of antiparticles.

Feynman’s discussion is carried on in Minkowski space extracting the nature of fermions and bosons from spacetime. We

[page 12]

want to do the opposite, starting from fermions and bosons and working Feynman’s argument backwards. A revision of Feynman’s essay will need a whole article into which I can pack all my ideas about creation and this critique of QFT will make the essay relevant.

Weinberg; ‘Quantum mechanics appears to be inevitable, but it is not enough. Quantum mechanics is not itself a dynamical theory. It is an empty stage. You have to add actors: you have to specify the space of configurations, an infinite dimensional complex space and the dynamical rules for how the state vector rotates in [this space] space as time passes.’

Perhaps we follow Augustine and imagine that we have a sea of random complex vectors that sometimes discover hermitian superposition and create a stationary state that acquires energy, potential and kinetic, to become a person, fermion + boson, ie hermitian symmetry. Weinberg’s ultimate symmetry is the initial symmetry.

Speed of light makes field superfluous. Field is held to have dynamic degrees of freedom which are more appropriate to real particles.

Pais 249: ‘Bohr would relive the struggles which it took before the content of quantum mechanics was understood and accepted.’ We have similar struggles in moulding theology and physics into complementary shapes all built in Hilbert space with photonlike base states, ie waves, [harmonic oscillators].

Friday 27 March 2026

I have still to get my new teeth but removal of the old ones all paid for.

Gradually digging deeper into my installation of Hilbert space into the initial singularity and getting glimpses into the fog that suggest how to cure QFT which seems simply as an interim measure for those afraid to leave classical physics and face the full beauty of the evolutionary power of Quantum Mechanics (see Born, top of page 10). Its great virtue, from my point of view, is its union with theology through the analogy with Augustine’s Trinity which was first a guess and is now becoming a way of life.

Quantum mechanics is getting more like music, a superposition of harmonic oscillators arising from the formal / abstract quantum mechanical split of action into potential and kinetic energy interpreted as two directions of time in the equation E =hf,where f is the rate of oscillation of the harmonic oscillator.

In a computer we have a clock (an oscillator) connected to a memory which differentiates the oscillations to create a process in which the content of each individual cycle is different so the quanta of action are differentiated from identical operations to different logical operations occurring in a sequence encoded as a sentence (like all this), a program or a quantum state vector, the program of a particle which gives it its personality just as my program, as a particle (a large meaningfully rather than statistically connected language model) that writes long series of letters lie this page,

[page 14]

A Hilbert space is an orchestra, a set of abstract harmonic oscillators, the most simple being a set of pure frequencies of normalized amplitudes. We complexify this by adding overtones to the individual oscillators making, in the orchestral case, sounds characteristic of different instruments, and we continue this analogy to generate a harmonic model of the universe.

Pais page 265: Wigner (1931): ‘It seems to me that the deliberate utilization of elementary symmetry properties is bound to correspond more closely to physical intuition than the more computational treatment.’

Saturday 28 March 2026

Keating’s vaudeville. Gen Z Genius: A Theory of Peace (1997-2012) Howard Manns (2016_06_06): The vaudeville, impact and substance of political name‑calling

On making the abstract concrete - ie Building. Sleep in to think about life. Do I need more self promotion? No, better work to perfect the product which is emerging slowly as I hope a ‘systematic integration of physics and theology’ whose abstract foundation is that the computing power of quantum mechanics is equivslent to the Aquinas / Hilbert characterization of action and mathematics — both can achieve anything that does not involve a contradicti0n. One conclusion: Revise the essay Theory of Peace to clarify this point and market under the headline above.

Every word counts. From Silent Generation to gneration A.

[page 15]

I was one of the silent generation. My youngest child is a late millennial and I sympathize with the had times facing by my Z and A grandchildren. This essay is for them [circulate to age, Australian, Guardian, WP, Osservatore Romano, NYP, NYT, Haaretz, Al Jazeera, Politico, ABC SBS, SCMP, Telegraph, Atlantic, New Yorker, Patreon, the Tatler, . . .]

The key to intelligence is not juxtaposition but superposition. At some time in the distant past the hominids must have begun to realize that we are much smarter than the other creatures that we catch and kill for food. Some time in the last five to ten thousand years these ideas became clear enough to be ‘written’ in some way by various forms of art like making weapons, breeding plants and animals, drawing, sculpture and all the other arts, whose communication framework was our development of languages, with sufficient complexity in word and gesture to communicate our ideas to one another. One of our greatest ‘scientific’ discoveries was the invention of writing which required the translation of phonemes, fragments of sound, into symbols like these letters or patterns of impression with a sharp stylus on specially shaped pieces of clay.

When all this development came to the notice of philosophers like Plato they conceived the ideas of abstract forms, somewhat immaterial entities that capture the nature of physical objects without being all that physical themselves and the conceptual distinction between form and matter entered the human world, the distinction which I call the gnostic gap, between mental and physical entities, things in the mind and things in the world.

[page 16]

This distinction became deeply embedded inhuman thought. We can guess that it is about 5000 years old and has got a lot to do with theology and philosophy. It is the ground of the belief exposed briefly by Aristotle and taken up whole heartedly by other authors, that our intelligence is the product of an immortal spiritual mind that must be specially created by the divinity, lies outside the power of material creation, and can never die. This is the fundamental theoretical foundation of organizations like the Roman Catholic Church. The Papacy stoutly defends this doctrine right up to the present day [totally rejecting the idea that human intelligence could have evolved like the intelligence of all the other animals]. Christopher Shields (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy b): The Active Mind of De Anima III 5, Pope John Paul II (22 October 1996): Address to Plenary Session on 'The Origins and Early Evolution of Life'

Since we started to build machines that can imitate some aspects of human thought, this doctrine has been opened to question and one of foundations of the modern technology of information and computation is that all information is physical, not spiritual. Or, at the minimum, all information, like this writing and the ideas floating around in my mind causing me to write these words is represented by a physical substrate, ink, electric charge, magnetic polarity or the chemical structures in my nervous system.

One question raised in this so4t of discussion is whether mathematics is in effect an eternal truth which has always been present in the world, waiting to be discovered, or is it something we have created for ourselvesd out of the thousands of years that readable mathematical texts have been in existence. This question is

[page 17]

very relevant to the creation of the world. The old idea attributed to philosophers like Plato and Aquinas is that mathematics is eternal. For Plato it has always existed in the heavenly ideas. for Aquinas it has always existed in the eternal mind of god.

So on to the initial singularity, Augustine and Hilbert space, superposition and quantum mechanics the hermitian extinction of complex spaces leading to the formation of real particles, etc. What we are saying in effect is that spirit is always embedded in matter and that from the beginning of the universe and forever after complex Hilbert space is the spiritual foundation of the universe embedded in the real initial eternal initial singularity / symmetry.

Copyright:

You may copy this material freely provided only that you quote fairly and provide a link (or reference) to your source.

Further reading

Books

Feynman (1999), Richard P, and Steven Weinberg, Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics: The 1986 Dirac Memorial Lectures, Cambridge University Press 1999 Jacket: Perhaps the two most important conceptual breakthroughs in twentieth century physics are relativity and quantum mechanics. Developing a theory that combines the two seamlessly is a difficult and ongoing challenge. This accessible book contains intriguing explorations of this theme by the distinguished physicists Richard Feynman and Steven Weinberg. Richard Feynman's contribution examines the nature of antiparticles, and in particular the relationship between quantum spin and statistics. In his essay, Steven Weinberg speculates on how Einstein's theory of gravitation might be reconciled with quantum theory and the final laws of physics.' 
Amazon
  back

Nicholls (2025), Jeffrey, Cognitive Cosmogenesis: A systematic unification of physics and theology, Austin Macauley Publishers 12025 ' This book is a personal narrative of those events and a defense of the belief that the universe itself is divine. The central argument is that by embracing this reality and abandoning notions of supernatural deities, humanity can resolve its problems. The universe, it is argued, is self-creating, and a proper understanding of physics leads to a plausible scientific theology. The natural intelligence inherent in the universe, from cellular organization to ecosystems, far surpasses any artificial intelligence. Comprehending this natural order, the author suggests, would make achieving world peace relatively straightforward. The book contends that modern theologians should recognize the physical world, rather than ancient texts, as the foundation for credible theology. It also addresses the historical entanglement of religion and politics, asserting that the model of creation presented herein fundamentally rejects the imperialistic ambitions that have fueled genocidal holy wars.'  
Amazon
  back

Links

A Theory of Justice - Wikipedia, A Theory of Justice - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'A Theory of Justice is a work of political philosophy and ethics by John Rawls, in which the author attempts to solve the problem of distributive justice (the socially just distribution of goods in a society) by utilising a variant of the familiar device of the social contract.' back

Alex Lo (2026_03_24), Donald Trump is the purest symbol of post-truth America, ' In 2015, a team of Canadian social science researchers published a study titled “On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bulls***” in the academic journal Judgment and Decision Making. A study the following year by German researchers identified a correlation between people prone to accepting BS statements and those who supported Trump in his first run for US president. It also found that those who tend to rely on first impressions and gut instincts rather than analysis are often more accepting of high-sounding humbug. The American electorate and the so-called Maga (Make America Great Again) far-right, Christian movement made Trump America’s president – twice.
In that sense, he is a symptom rather than the disease. That could be the most terrifying truth about post-truth America.' back

Aquinas, Summa I, 22, 2, Does everything come under divine providence?, ' We must say, however, that all things are subject to divine providence, not only in general, but even in their own individual selves. This is made evident thus. For since every agent acts for an end, the ordering of effects towards that end extends as far as the causality of the first agent extends. Whence it happens that in the effects of an agent something takes place which has no reference towards the end, because the effect comes from a cause other than, and outside the intention of the agent. But the causality of God, Who is the first agent, extends to all being, not only as to constituent principles of species, but also as to the individualizing principles; not only of things incorruptible, but also of things corruptible. Hence all things that exist in whatsoever manner are necessarily directed by God towards some end; . . . ' back

Aquinas, Summa, I, 22, 1, Is providence suitably attributed to God, ' This good of order existing in things created, is itself created by God. Since, however, God is the cause of things by His intellect, and thus it behooves that the type of every effect should pre-exist in Him, . . . it is necessary that the type of the order of things towards their end should pre-exist in the divine mind: and the type of things ordered towards an end is, properly speaking, providence. For it is the chief part of prudence, to which two other parts are directed—namely, remembrance of the past, and understanding of the present; inasmuch as from the remembrance of what is past and the understanding of what is present, we gather how to provide for the future.' back

Associate Professor Neil Foster (2020), Respecting the Dignity of Religious Organisations: When is it appropriate for Courts to decide Religious Doctrine? , ' The notion of “dignity” is usually associated with individuals. But in the religious sphere, individuals often join together as part of organisations, whether “churches”nor other groups. Court decisions in disputes involving religious parties may involve the court being invited to decide what is a “valid” or “correct” religious doctrine. But is it consistent with the dignity that ought to be afforded to religious persons and groups for secular courts to take on a role as “amateur theologians”? There are good public policy reasons to suggest not, based on the lack of expertise of judicial officers, and religious freedom considerations supporting the authority and dignity of religious actors to decide the meaning of their own doctrines. However, in some cases, courts are required to determine religious questions for the purposes of enforcing a private law right, such as under a charitable trust for the advancement of religion, or an employment contract. Refusing to decide these issues in such cases may leave deserving parties without a valid remedy. This article reviews the approach to this issue taken by courts in the United States, United Kingdom and Australia, in order to determine whether these different decisions can be reconciled. It recommends that courts usually continue to respect the dignity of religious organisations by declining to determine the content of religious doctrine, but should be willing to do so where the private rights of parties arise under a religious regime initially accepted by the parties concerned.' back

Catholic Catechism: §2475 sqq., III. Offenses Against Truth, ' 2475 Christ's disciples have "put on the new man, created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness."273 By "putting away falsehood," they are to "put away all malice and all guile and insincerity and envy and all slander."274 2476 False witness and perjury. When it is made publicly, a statement contrary to the truth takes on a particular gravity. In court it becomes false witness.275 When it is under oath, it is perjury. Acts such as these contribute to condemnation of the innocent, exoneration of the guilty, or the increased punishment of the accused.276 They gravely compromise the exercise of justice and the fairness of judicial decisions [. . .]
. 2482 "A lie consists in speaking a falsehood with the intention of deceiving."280 The Lord denounces lying as the work of the devil: "You are of your father the devil, . . . there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies."
2483 Lying is the most direct offense against the truth. To lie is to speak or act against the truth in order to lead into error someone who has the right to know the truth. By injuring man's relation to truth and to his neighbor, a lie offends against the fundamental relation of man and of his word to the Lord.
2484 The gravity of a lie is measured against the nature of the truth it deforms, the circumstances, the intentions of the one who lies, and the harm suffered by its victims. If a lie in itself only constitutes a venial sin, it becomes mortal when it does grave injury to the virtues of justice and charity.
2485 By its very nature, lying is to be condemned. It is a profanation of speech, whereas the purpose of speech is to communicate known truth to others. the deliberate intention of leading a neighbor into error by saying things contrary to the truth constitutes a failure in justice and charity. the culpability is greater when the intention of deceiving entails the risk of deadly consequences for those who are led astray. 2486 Since it violates the virtue of truthfulness, a lie does real violence to another. It affects his ability to know, which is a condition of every judgment and decision. It contains the seed of discord and all consequent evils. Lying is destructive of society; it undermines trust among men and tears apart the fabric of social relationships.
2487 Every offense committed against justice and truth entails the duty of reparation, even if its author has been forgiven. When it is impossible publicly to make reparation for a wrong, it must be made secretly. If someone who has suffered harm cannot be directly compensated, he must be given moral satisfaction in the name of charity. This duty of reparation also concerns offenses against another's reputation. This reparation, moral and sometimes material, must be evaluated in terms of the extent of the damage inflicted. It obliges in conscience./ back

Christopher Shields (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy b), The Active Mind of De Anima III 5 , ' After characterizingnous the mind (nous) and its activities in De Animaiii 4, Aristotle takes a surprising turn. In De Anima iii 5, he introduces an obscure and hotly disputed subject: the active mind or active intellect (nous poiêtikos). Controversy surrounds almost every aspect of De Anima iii 5, not least because in it Aristotle characterizes the active mind—a topic mentioned nowhere else in his entire corpus—as ‘separate and unaffected and unmixed, being in its essence actuality’ (chôristos kai apathês kai amigês, tê ousia energeia; DA iii 5, 430a17–18) and then also as ‘deathless and everlasting’ (athanaton kai aidion; DA iii 5, 430a23). This comes as no small surprise to readers of De Anima, because Aristotle had earlier in the same work treated the mind (nous) as but one faculty (dunamis) of the soul (psuchê), and he had contended that the soul as a whole is not separable from the body (DA ii 1, 413a3–5). back

ELT Home, The Extremely Large Telescope; Home, ' Extremely large telescopes are considered worldwide to be one of the highest priorities in ground-based astronomy. They will lead to a greater advancement of astrophysical knowledge, allow a deeper exploration of our Universe, and give sharper views of cosmic objects than ever before. 
Since 2005 ESO has been working with its community and industry to develop an extremely large optical/infrared telescope. ESO’s Extremely Large Telescope, or ELT for short, is a revolutionary ground-based telescope that will have a 39-metre main mirror and will be the largest visible and infrared light telescope in the world: the world’s biggest eye on the sky. In addition to this unparalleled size, the ELT will be equipped with a lineup of cutting-edge instruments, designed to cover a wide range of scientific possibilities. The leap forwards with the ELT can lead to a paradigm shift in our perception of the Universe, much as Galileo's telescope did 400 years ago. ' back

Evangelical counsels - Wikipedia, Evangelical counsels - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' In Christianity, the three evangelical counsels or counsels of perfection are chastity, poverty (or perfect charity), and obedience. As stated by Jesus in the canonical gospels, they are counsels for those who desire to become "perfect" (τελειος, teleios). The Catholic Church interprets this to mean that they are not binding upon all, and hence not necessary conditions to attain eternal life (heaven), but that they are "acts of supererogation" exceeding the minimum stipulated in the biblical commandments. Catholics who have made a public profession to order their life by the evangelical counsels, and confirmed this by public vows before their competent church authority (the act of religious commitment known as a profession), are recognised as members of the consecrated life.' back

Generation Z - Wikipedia, Generation Z - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' Generation Z, often shortened to Gen Z and informally known as Zoomers, is the demographic cohort succeeding Millennials and preceding Generation Alpha. Researchers and popular media use the mid-to-late 1990s as starting birth years and the early 2010s as ending birth years, with the generation typically being defined as people born from 1997 to 2012. Most members of Generation Z are the children of members of Generation X, and it is predicted that many will be the parents of Generation Beta.[. . .] There is greater awareness and diagnosis of mental health conditions among Generation Z, and sleep deprivation is more frequently reported.Moreover, the negative effects of screen time in the late 2010s were most pronounced in adolescents, as compared to younger children. Youth subcultures have not disappeared, but they have been quieter.Nostalgia is a major theme of youth culture in the 2010s and 2020s. Meanwhile, Generation Z has been active in politics around the world.' back

Helen Shaw (2026_03_22), The 2,500-Year-Old Greek Heroine Whose Story Never Gets Old, ' Antigone, deinos to the max, created the model for a particular kind of (anti)heroine: the “bad girl.” She is disruptive, a total pain, unpliable and correct. Sometimes this figure is interpreted as a kind of punky riot grrl, or a protofeminist, or a mentally troubled woman. Thanks to Sophocles, who was writing in a time when women didn’t rate as citizens, “girl” is now another word for “courage.” Imagine one, arms akimbo, ponytail flying, and you automatically picture her facing down the world. [. . .]
And, whenever I am in doubt, I listen to the truly great musical setting of this text in Lee Breuer and Bob Telson’s “The Gospel at Colonus.” It takes the most hopeful option for translation, “wonder,” but then sets it to music so yearning that we hear how insubstantial mankind really is.
Numberless are the world’s wonders
But none more wonderful than man
So, should mankind be feared or wondered at? Are we a terror or a gift? Are we of the world, or are we the strangers who break the world apart?
Yes, “Antigone” tells us. Yes, absolutely.' back

Howard Manns (2016_06_06), The vaudeville, impact and substance of political name‑calling , 'Scott Morrison would have us think politics is more war than performance whereas names like ScoMo tell us quite the opposite. When pollies, in the words of Paul Keating, “turn the switch to vaudeville”, we like nothing more than to slap names on our political heroes and villains, and to sit bemused and amused at the names they give one another.
Moreover, political nicknames hint at the overlap between politics and performance. Lady Macbeth has been applied to ambitious female politicians, including Hillary Clinton and Julia Gillard. As an aside, it’s worth noting that that the word ambitious has links to the Latin ambitiō meaning “to go around soliciting votes”.
Gillard and Rudd as a pair garnered the moniker Kath and Kev (a cheeky reference to Kath and Kim) and Belgian-born Mathias Cormann has been called The Cormanator (a tongue-in-cheek reference to another accented politician, The Governator Arnold Schwarzenegger). Cormann’s reference to Bill Shorten as a Girly Man only served to strengthen these links.
In sum, it’s difficult to take the war metaphor seriously when the supposed warriors are desiccated coconuts (Keating on John Howard), half-baked crims (Keating on Wilson Tuckey), unrepresentative swill (Keating on the Senate) or a shiver looking for a spine to run up (Keating on John Hewson).
Election 2016’s monikers – e.g. Bill Shorten’s moobs,a blend of man boobs, Electricity Bill; Malcolm Turnbull’s out of touch; daddy – do nothing to dissuade us from this view.
But do names and nicknames matter?
back

Jason Reifler (2026_03_25), Iran war lacks strategy, goals, legitimacy and support – in the US and around the world, Approximately one month into the Iran war, public opinion on both sides of the Atlantic is decidedly opposed to this conflict. A recent CBS/YouGov poll shows that 60% of the public oppose military action against Iran, as do a similar percentage in the UK: 59%.
As a political scientist who studies public attitudes about foreign policy and the use of force, my research addresses an important question: under what conditions do people support military action? Based on this research, the widespread opposition to American military action against Iran is completely understandable, as the action lacks the usual foundations for support from domestic as well as international audiences.
Decades of research in political science show that broad support for use of the military rests on three key pillars: purpose, likelihood of success and legitimacy. When these elements are present, support can be high. It can even be maintained in the face of significant costs, both financial and in terms of lives lost. When they are absent, support tends to be weak, polarised and prone to erosion.
At present, these key ingredients are missing. [. . .]
Without significant changes in clarity of goal, verifiable indicators of success, or signals of legitimacy from persuasive actors outside the administration, support will diminish. But the consequences are graver than the domestic popularity of an American military operation. Sidelining institutional constraints – such as Congressional authorisation and international institutions – erodes limits on the use of force.
When the US ignores these constraints, it invites other countries to do the same, resulting in a more unstable and insecure world.' back

Jean Decety and Keith J. Yoder (2016_11_16), The Emerging Social Neuroscience of Justice Motivation, 'Humans from a very early age are deeply sensitive to issues of justice and fairness, both in their own lives and in the lives of others. Most people are highly motivated to pursue justice and condemn injustice. Where does this concern for justice come from? Here we integrate findings in evolution, development, psychology, behavioral economics, and social neuroscience to highlight multiple potential drivers of justice motivation. We argue that justice motivation arises from complementary rapid heuristics and deliberation, each utilizing distinct and interacting neural circuitry. This framework is useful for explaining observed symmetries and asymmetries in responses to experiencing or observing injustice and may help to explain why individuals vary in their responses to injustice. back

Jeffrey Nicholls (1967), How universal is the universe?, ' 61 The future is beyond our comprehension, but we can get an idea of it and speed its coming by studying what we already have. Contemplating the size and wonder of the universe as it stands in the light of its openness to the future must surely be a powerful incentive to men to love God. We have come a long way since the little world of St Thomas. Ours is open to all things, even participating in god. This is what I mean by universal. ' back

John Rawls - Wikipedia, John Rawls - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' John Bordley Rawls ( February 21, 1921 – November 24, 2002) was an American moral and political philosopher in the liberal tradition. Rawls received both the Schock Prize for Logic and Philosophy and the National Humanities Medal in 1999, the latter presented by President Bill Clinton, in recognition of how Rawls's work "helped a whole generation of learned Americans revive their faith in democracy itself."' back

Jonathan Rauch (2025-02_24), One Word Describes Trump, ' What exactly is Donald Trump doing? Since taking office, he has reduced his administration’s effectiveness by appointing to essential agencies people who lack the skills and temperaments to do their jobs. His mass firings have emptied the civil service of many of its most capable employees. He has defied laws that he could just as easily have followed (for instance, refusing to notify Congress 30 days before firing inspectors general). He has disregarded the plain language of statutes, court rulings, and the Constitution, setting up confrontations with the courts that he is likely to lose. Few of his orders have gone through a policy-development process that helps ensure they won’t fail or backfire—thus ensuring that many will. [, , ,]
There is an answer, and it is not classic authoritarianism—nor is it autocracy, oligarchy, or monarchy. Trump is installing what scholars call patrimonialism. Understanding patrimonialism is essential to defeating it. In particular, it has a fatal weakness that Democrats and Trump’s other opponents should make their primary and relentless line of attack. [. . .]
Patrimonialism is less a form of government than a style of governing. It is not defined by institutions or rules; rather, it can infect all forms of government by replacing impersonal, formal lines of authority with personalized, informal ones. Based on individual loyalty and connections, and on rewarding friends and punishing enemies (real or perceived), it can be found not just in states but also among tribes, street gangs, and criminal organizations.
In its governmental guise, patrimonialism is distinguished by running the state as if it were the leader’s personal property or family business. It can be found in many countries, but its main contemporary exponent—at least until January 20, 2025—has been Vladimir Putin. In the first portion of his rule, he ran the Russian state as a personal racket. State bureaucracies and private companies continued to operate, but the real governing principle was Stay on Vladimir Vladimirovich’s good side … or else.
back

Kali Hays, Nardine Saad & Regan Morris (2026_28, 27), Campaigners welcome Meta and YouTube's defeat in landmark social media addiction trial, ' Parents and campaign groups seeking tighter restrictions on social media have welcomed a Los Angeles jury handing down an unprecedented win for a young woman who sued Meta and YouTube over her childhood addiction to social media.
Jurors found that Meta, which owns Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp, and Google, owner of YouTube, intentionally built addictive social media platforms that harmed the 20-year old's mental health.
The woman, known as Kaley, was awarded $6m (£4.5m) in damages, a result likely to have implications for hundreds of similar cases now winding their way through US courts.
. Meta and Google said they disagreed with the verdict and intended to appeal.
Meta said: "Teen mental health is profoundly complex and cannot be linked to a single app.
"We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously as every case is different, and we remain confident in our record of protecting teens online."
A spokesperson for Google said: "This case misunderstands YouTube, which is a responsibly built streaming platform, not a social media site."
But speaking to BBC Breakfast, Ellen Roome, who is herself suing TikTok after the death of her son, said the case was an "enough was enough" moment.' back

Kevin Veale (2026_03_23), Using your AI chatbot as a search engine? Be careful what you believe, ' AI platforms such as ChatGPT and Claude don’t work like a conventional search engine. But people use them as one because they seem to summarise complex topics quickly and require fewer clicks than conventional internet searches.
Search engines rely on articles and text about a given topic, and then weigh how reliable those articles are. Generative AI instead relies on huge bodies of text, from which it measures the odds of words appearing next to each other.
These “large language models” are purely looking to generate reasonable-looking sentences, rather than accurate ones. [. . .]
OpenAI, which developed ChatGPT, has admitted (based on its own study) there’s no way to stop false information being presented as truth due to the way generative AI works. Explaining why large language models “hallucinate”, the researchers wrote:
Like students facing hard exam questions, large language models sometimes guess when uncertain, producing plausible yet incorrect statements instead of admitting uncertainty. [. . .]
The problem, as another scientist noted, is that generative AI “finds and mimics patterns of words”. Being right or wrong is not really the point: “It was supposed to make a sentence and it did.” Research has shown generative AI tools misrepresent the news 45% of the time, no matter the language or geographic region. And there is now genuine concern about AI risking lives by generating non-existent hiking routes.' back

LIGO Scientific Collaboration & Virgo Collaboration, GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalsescene at Redshift 0.2, ' We describe the observation of GW170104, a gravitational-wave signal produced by the coalescence of a pair of stellar-mass black holes. The signal was measured on January 4, 2017 at 10:11:58.6 UTC by the twin advanced detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory during their second observing run, with a network signal-to-noise ratio of 13 and a false alarm rate less than 1 in 70,000 years. back

Mary Sirridge (1999), "Quam videndo intus dicimus": Seeing and Saying in De Trinitate XV, ' What is being asserted is that thought has the same form as seeing or speaking respectively, i.e., that it works essentially like seeing or speaking, that thought is a formal and functional isomorph of seeing or speaking.' back

Myra Cheng et al. (2026_03_2026, Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence, ' Editor’s summary The sycophantic (flattering, people-pleasing, affirming) behavior of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, which has been designed to increase user engagement, poses risks as people increasingly seek advice about interpersonal dilemmas. There is usually more than one side to a story during interpersonal conflicts. If AI is designed to tell users what they want to hear instead of challenging their perspectives, then are such systems likely to motivate people to accept responsibility for their own contribution to conflicts and repair relationships? Cheng et al. measured the prevalence of social sycophancy across 11 leading large language models (see the Perspective by Perry). The model’s responses were nearly 50% more sycophantic than humans’, even when users engaged in unethical, illegal, or harmful behaviors. Users preferred and trusted sycophantic AI responses, incentivizing AI developers to preserve sycophancy despite the risks.' —Ekeoma Uzogara back

Nicholas A. Christakis (2026_03_, I traveled to Ukraine to teach sociology. It left me amazed., ' I’d never taught in a war zone before. But when the rector of the Kyiv School of Economics called last autumn, I found it impossible to say no. Three days in a nice hotel with a fortified bomb shelter while the rest of the country endured daily attacks? The visit seemed like a small show of solidarity with scientific colleagues and the Ukrainian people. The conversations animating the Editorial Board, delivered to your inbox every Tuesday
It felt, too, like an opportunity to witness theory in practice. Having spent my career studying the biological and social roots of collective human behavior, I understood that wider circles of people exchanging ideas can make groups tighter and more inventive. I also knew that shared adversity leads to cohesion. Still, I was amazed at what I saw.' back

P. A. M. Dirac (1928_02_02), The Quantum Theory of the elecron Part II, 'In a previous paper by the author* it is shown that the general theory of quantum mechanics together with relativity require the wave equation for an electron moving in an arbitrary electromagnetic field of potentials, A0, A1, A2, A3 to be of the form [. . .]
The αs are new dynamical variables which it is necessary to introduce in order to satisfy the conditions of the problem. They may be regarded as describing some internal motion of the electron, which for most purposes may be taken to be the spin of the electron postulated in previous theories. We shall call them the spin variables.' back

Pope John Paul II (22 October 1996), Address to Plenary Session on 'The Origins and Early Evolution of Life', ' John Paul II refers to Pius XI’s hope that the Academy would become a Senatus scientificus. In relation to the origins of life and the universe the Pope asks: ‘How do the conclusions reached by the various scientific disciplines coincide with those contained in the message of Revelation? And if, at first sight, there are apparent contradictions, in what direction do we look for their solution?’ John Paul II surveys the Magisterium’s comments on the theory of evolution and adds that ‘to tell the truth, rather than the theory of evolution, we should speak of several theories of evolution’. Those theories of evolution which ‘consider the mind as emerging from the forces of living matter’ are ‘incompatible with the truth about man’. The human being, indeed, is ‘called to enter into eternal life’.' back

Wojciech Hubert Zurek (2008), Quantum origin of quantum jumps: breaking of unitary symmetry induced by information transfer and the transition from quantum to classical, 'Submitted on 17 Mar 2007 (v1), last revised 18 Mar 2008 (this version, v3)) Measurements transfer information about a system to the apparatus, and then further on – to observers and (often inadvertently) to the environment. I show that even imperfect copying essential in such situations restricts possible unperturbed outcomes to an orthogonal subset of all possible states of the system, thus breaking the unitary symmetry of its Hilbert space implied by the quantum superposition principle. Preferred outcome states emerge as a result. They provide framework for the “wavepacket collapse”, designating terminal points of quantum jumps, and defining the measured observable by specifying its eigenstates.' back

www.naturaltheology.net is maintained by The Theology Company Proprietary Limited ACN 097 887 075 ABN 74 097 887 075 Copyright 2000-2026 © Jeffrey Nicholls